Notes of Decisions
Barrie v. United States Dep't of Labor, 597 F. Supp. 2d 1235 (D. Colo. 2009).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d. Plaintiff initially filed claims under both Part B and Part D — which was subsequently repealed by Congress and replaced with Part E — of the EEOICPA.”
Smith v. United States Dep't of Labor, 928 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D. Nev. 2012).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d. Part B of the Act provides lump sum benefits up to $150,000, as well as related medical expenses, to workers who contracted certain diseases (e.”
Hobson v. Zep, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-03055 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2020).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d. The DOL is designated as the administrating agency of the program.”
Faine v. Zep, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-05729 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2020).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d. The DOL is designated as the administrating agency of the program.”
Counts v. United States Dep't of Labor, No. 1:22-cv-00435 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2025).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d(b). Under Part B of the EEOICPA, covered employees or their eligible survivors can receive compensation in the form of a lump-sum payment of $150,000.”
In re Luttrell, 313 B.R. 751 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004).
“42 U.S.C.A. § 7384d(b). Under the terms of the EEOICPA, “a covered employee, or the survivor of that covered employee if the employee is deceased, shall receive compensation for the disability or death of that employee from the employee’s occupational illness in the amount of…”
42 U.S.C. § 7384d(a): 1 case
42 U.S.C. § 7384d(b): 4 cases
Counts v. United States Dep't of Labor, No. 1:22-cv-00435 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2025).
“” 42 U.S.C. § 7384d(b). Under Part B of the EEOICPA, covered employees or their eligible survivors can receive compensation in the form of a lump-sum payment of $150,000.”
In re Luttrell, 313 B.R. 751 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004).
“42 U.S.C.A. § 7384d(b). Under the terms of the EEOICPA, “a covered employee, or the survivor of that covered employee if the employee is deceased, shall receive compensation for the disability or death of that employee from the employee’s occupational illness in the amount of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.