Notes of Decisions
All. for Clean Coal v. Bayh, 888 F. Supp. 924 (S.D. Ind. 1995).
“42 U.S.C. § 7651d. Under the 1990 CAAA, coal burning electric plants are again free to comply with S02 emissions standards by the most cost-effective means.”
All. for Clean Coal v. Craig, 840 F. Supp. 554 (N.D. Ill. 1993).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 7651d. Under the 1990 clean air act, coal-burning electric plants again will be free to comply with sulfur dioxide emissions standards in the cheapest way possible.”
Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 25 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 1994).
· cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. §§ 7651d(c)(l), (c)(3). Whether Springfield is entitled to this classification depends in turn on whether “generating capacity” is defined as “name-plate capacity,” the EPA’s choice, or as “summer net dependable capability,” as Springfield prefers.”
State v. Env't Prot. Agency, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
“42 U.S.C. § 7651d(g)(6)(A); see id. § 7651i (detailing “electing — in” provisions).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(a) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(b)(3) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(c)(2) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(c)(l) — 1 case
Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 25 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 1994).
“42 U.S.C. §§ 7651d(c)(l), (c)(3). Whether Springfield is entitled to this classification depends in turn on whether “generating capacity” is defined as “name-plate capacity,” the EPA’s choice, or as “summer net dependable capability,” as Springfield prefers.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(e)(l) — 1 case
Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 25 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 1994).
“42 U.S.C. §§ 7651d(c)(l), (c)(3). Whether Springfield is entitled to this classification depends in turn on whether “generating capacity” is defined as “name-plate capacity,” the EPA’s choice, or as “summer net dependable capability,” as Springfield prefers.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(g)(3) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651d(g)(6)(A) — 2 cases
State v. Env't Prot. Agency, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
“42 U.S.C. § 7651d(g)(6)(A); see id. § 7651i (detailing “electing — in” provisions).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.