U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 85— AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV–A— ACID DEPOSITION CONTROL

42 U.S.C. § 7651f

Nitrogen oxides emission reduction program

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Applicability

On the date that a coal-fired utility unit becomes an affected unit pursuant to sections 7651c, 7651d,11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “or”. 7651h of this title, or on the date a unit subject to the provisions of section 7651c(d) or 7651h(b) of this title, must meet the SO2 reduction requirements, each such unit shall become an affected unit for purposes of this section and shall be subject to the emission limitations for nitrogen oxides set forth herein.

(b) Emission limitations(1) Not later than eighteen months after November 15, 1990, the Administrator shall by regulation establish annual allowable emission limitations for nitrogen oxides for the types of utility boilers listed below, which limitations shall not exceed the rates listed below: Provided, That the Administrator may set a rate higher than that listed for any type of utility boiler if the Administrator finds that the maximum listed rate for that boiler type cannot be achieved using low NOx burner technology. The maximum allowable emission rates are as follows:(A) for tangentially fired boilers, 0.45 lb/mmBtu;(B) for dry bottom wall-fired boilers (other than units applying cell burner technology), 0.50 lb/mmBtu.After January 1, 1995, it shall be unlawful for any unit that is an affected unit on that date and is of the type listed in this paragraph to emit nitrogen oxides in excess of the emission rates set by the Administrator pursuant to this paragraph.(2) Not later than January 1, 1997, the Administrator shall, by regulation, establish allowable emission limitations on a lb/mmBtu, annual average basis, for nitrogen oxides for the following types of utility boilers:(A) wet bottom wall-fired boilers;(B) cyclones;(C) units applying cell burner technology;(D) all other types of utility boilers.The Administrator shall base such rates on the degree of reduction achievable through the retrofit application of the best system of continuous emission reduction, taking into account available technology, costs and energy and environmental impacts; and which is comparable to the costs of nitrogen oxides controls set pursuant to subsection (b)(1). Not later than January 1, 1997, the Administrator may revise the applicable emission limitations for tangentially fired and dry bottom, wall-fired boilers (other than cell burners) to be more stringent if the Administrator determines that more effective low NOx burner technology is available: Provided, That, no unit that is an affected unit pursuant to section 7651c of this title and that is subject to the requirements of subsection (b)(1), shall be subject to the revised emission limitations, if any.(c) Revised performance standards(1) 22 So in original. No par. (2) has been enacted. Not later than January 1, 1993, the Administrator shall propose revised standards of performance to section 7411 of this title for nitrogen oxides emissions from fossil-fuel fired steam generating units, including both electric utility and nonutility units. Not later than January 1, 1994, the Administrator shall promulgate such revised standards of performance. Such revised standards of performance shall reflect improvements in methods for the reduction of emissions of oxides of nitrogen.(d) Alternative emission limitationsThe permitting authority shall, upon request of an owner or operator of a unit subject to this section, authorize an emission limitation less stringent than the applicable limitation established under subsection (b)(1) or (b)(2) upon a determination that—(1) a unit subject to subsection (b)(1) cannot meet the applicable limitation using low NOx burner technology; or(2) a unit subject to subsection (b)(2) cannot meet the applicable rate using the technology on which the Administrator based the applicable emission limitation.The permitting authority shall base such determination upon a showing satisfactory to the permitting authority, in accordance with regulations established by the Administrator not later than eighteen months after November 15, 1990, that the owner or operator—(1) has properly installed appropriate control equipment designed to meet the applicable emission rate;(2) has properly operated such equipment for a period of fifteen months (or such other period of time as the Administrator determines through the regulations), and provides operating and monitoring data for such period demonstrating that the unit cannot meet the applicable emission rate; and(3) has specified an emission rate that such unit can meet on an annual average basis.The permitting authority shall issue an operating permit for the unit in question, in accordance with section 7651g of this title and part B 33 See References in Text note below. of title III—(i) that permits the unit during the demonstration period referred to in subparagraph (2) above, to emit at a rate in excess of the applicable emission rate;(ii) at the conclusion of the demonstration period to revise the operating permit to reflect the alternative emission rate demonstrated in paragraphs (2) and (3) above.Units subject to subsection (b)(1) for which an alternative emission limitation is established shall not be required to install any additional control technology beyond low NOx burners. Nothing in this section shall preclude an owner or operator from installing and operating an alternative NOx control technology capable of achieving the applicable emission limitation. If the owner or operator of a unit subject to the emissions limitation requirements of subsection (b)(1) demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the technology necessary to meet such requirements is not in adequate supply to enable its installation and operation at the unit, consistent with system reliability, by January 1, 1995, then the Administrator shall extend the deadline for compliance for the unit by a period of 15 months. Any owner or operator may petition the Administrator to make a determination under the previous sentence. The Administrator shall grant or deny such petition within 3 months of submittal.(e) Emissions averaging

In lieu of complying with the applicable emission limitations under subsection (b)(1), (2), or (d), the owner or operator of two or more units subject to one or more of the applicable emission limitations set pursuant to these sections,44 So in original. Probably should be “subsections,”. may petition the permitting authority for alternative contemporaneous annual emission limitations for such units that ensure that (1) the actual annual emission rate in pounds of nitrogen oxides per million Btu averaged over the units in question is a rate that is less than or equal to (2) the Btu-weighted average annual emission rate for the same units if they had been operated, during the same period of time, in compliance with limitations set in accordance with the applicable emission rates set pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and (2).

If the permitting authority determines, in accordance with regulations issued by the Administrator not later than eighteen months after November 15, 1990; 55 So in original. The semicolon probably should be a comma. that the conditions in the paragraph above can be met, the permitting authority shall issue operating permits for such units, in accordance with section 7651g of this title and part B 3 of title III, that allow alternative contemporaneous annual emission limitations. Such emission limitations shall only remain in effect while both units continue operation under the conditions specified in their respective operating permits.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title IV, § 407, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title IV, § 401, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2613.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Part B of title III, referred to in subsecs. (d) and (e), means title III of the Clean Air Act, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, as added, which is classified to subchapter III of this chapter, but title III does not contain parts. For provisions of the Clean Air Act relating to permits, see subchapter V (§ 7661 et seq.) of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). · cites it 25× “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
Am. Lung Ass'n v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(2) (emphasis added).”
Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Env't Prot. Agency, 749 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “pdf; see 42 U.S.C. § 7651f. Since 1980, the national average S02 concentration has dropped 78 percent.”
Alabama Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 40 F.3d 450 (D.C. Cir. 1994). · cites it 6× “42 U.S.C. § 7651f (section 407). The group at issue here includes “tangentially fired boilers” and “dry bottom wall-fired boilers.”
Lignite Energy Council,petitioners v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Gas Supply Ass'n, Intervenors, 198 F.3d 930 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(c)(1). In response to these statutory mandates, EPA promulgated a rule lowering its NOx new source performance standards to .”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a) — 1 case
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(2) — 2 cases
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
Am. Lung Ass'n v. EPA, 985 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(2) (emphasis added).”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(2)(A) — 1 case
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(2)(C) — 1 case
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(l) — 2 cases
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
Alabama Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 40 F.3d 450 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f (section 407). The group at issue here includes “tangentially fired boilers” and “dry bottom wall-fired boilers.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(b)(l)(B) — 1 case
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(c)(1) — 1 case
Lignite Energy Council,petitioners v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Nat. Gas Supply Ass'n, Intervenors, 198 F.3d 930 (D.C. Cir. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(c)(1). In response to these statutory mandates, EPA promulgated a rule lowering its NOx new source performance standards to .”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(d) — 2 cases
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
Alabama Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 40 F.3d 450 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f (section 407). The group at issue here includes “tangentially fired boilers” and “dry bottom wall-fired boilers.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(d)(l) — 1 case
Alabama Power Co. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 40 F.3d 450 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f (section 407). The group at issue here includes “tangentially fired boilers” and “dry bottom wall-fired boilers.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 7651f(e) — 1 case
Appalachian Power Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, Pub. Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., Intervenors, 135 F.3d 791 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “42 U.S.C. § 7651f(a). Because a Phase I “affected unit” (defined as “a unit that is subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under this subchapter,” 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.