43 U.S.C. § 300
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, § 704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1971–2016 · leading case: United States v. City & Cnty. of Denver Ex Rel. Bd. of Water Commissioners, 656 P.2d 1 (Colo. 1982).
United States v. City & Cnty. of Denver Ex Rel. Bd. of Water Commissioners, 656 P.2d 1 (Colo. 1982). “43 U.S.C. § 300 (1976). 47 The executive order, Public Water Reserve No.”
United States v. Barthelmess Ranch Corp., 386 P.3d 952 (Mont. 2016). “” 43 U.S.C. § 300 (1912). The subsequent PWR 107 reserved all springs and water holes on vacant, unappropriated, and unreserved public land throughout the country.”
United States v. State, 959 P.2d 449 (Idaho 1998). “Section 10 of the SRHA of 1916, 43 U.S.C. § 300 , states: [L]ands containing water holes or other bodies of water needed or used by the public for watering purposes shall not be designated under this Act but may be reserved under the provisions of [the Pickett] Act of June…”
USA BLM - Barthelmess, 2016 MT 348 (Mont. 2016). “” 43 U.S.C. § 300 (1912). The subsequent PWR 107 reserved all springs and water holes on vacant, unappropriated, and unreserved public 2 A “pothole” in this context usually describes a natural depression in the landscape that contains water.”
Park Ctr. Water Dist. v. United States, 781 P.2d 90 (Colo. 1989). “The authority for the executive order was section 10 of the Stock Raising Homestead Act, 43 U.S.C. § 300 (repealed 1976). See United States v.”
Leslie F. Bleamaster & Norma v. Bleamaster v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, 448 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir. 1971). “865 , 43 U.S.C. § 300 , as lands necessary to insure access to Public Water Reserve No.”
United States v. State, 959 P.2d 449 (Idaho 1998). “Section 10 of the SRHA of 1916, 43 U.S.C. § 300 , states: [L]ands containing water holes or other bodies of water needed or used by the public for watering purposes shall not be designated under this Act but may be reserved under the provisions of [the Pickett] Act of June…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.