43 U.S.C. § 411
SHORT TITLE.
“This part may be cited as the ‘Reclamation States Drought Assistance Act of 1988’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1938–2026 · leading case: Rank v. Krug, 90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. Cal. 1950).
Rank v. Krug, 90 F. Supp. 773 (S.D. Cal. 1950). “That the Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized and directed to make examinations and surveys for, and to locate and construct, as herein provided, irrigation works for the storage, diversion, and development of waters, * * * ” 43 U.S.C.A. § 411 . “Sec. 7. That where in…”
Verde River Irrigation & Power Dist. v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n, 94 F.2d 936 (9th Cir. 1938). “Appellant alleges that this latter contract was not made pursuant to 43 U.S.C.A. §§ 411 , 412, 413, because the project was not, prior to execution of the contract, approved either by the President or the Chief of Engineers, or submitted to Congress for approval, and no…”
Yurok Tribe v. Klamath Water Users Ass'n (9th Cir. 2026). “See 43 U.S.C. § 411. Instead, the Reclamation Act gives the Secretary of the Interior a broad authority to “perform any and all acts and to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of [the Reclamation Act] into…”
N. Colorado Water Conservancy Dist. v. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 636 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “§ 2, 32 Stat at 388 (codified, as amended, at 43 U.S.C. § 411 ). In addition, the Reclamation Act stated “[tjhat the title to and the management and operation of the reservoirs and the works necessary for their protection and operation shall remain in the [government until…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.