43 U.S.C. § 423f
Purpose of sections 423 to 423g and 610
The purpose of sections 423 to 423g and 610 of this title is the rehabilitation of the several reclamation projects and the insuring of their future success by placing them upon a sound operative and business basis, and the Secretary of the Interior is directed to administer said sections to those ends.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1953–2013 · leading case: Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 538 F.3d 1299 (10th Cir. 2008).
Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 538 F.3d 1299 (10th Cir. 2008). “The Districts based Count VI on the Secretary’s alleged duty to manage the grazing lands “on a sound operative and business basis” as set out in the Omnibus Adjustment Act of 1926, 43 U.S.C. § 423f (OAA). They contended that this statutory language, combined' with that of…”
San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United States, 709 F.3d 798 (9th Cir. 2013). “” 43 U.S.C. § 423f. Congress delegated to the Secretary of the Interior, and by extension to the Bureau, the discretion to determine the best way to meet those goals.”
San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United States, 772 F. Supp. 2d 1210 (E.D. Cal. 2011). “Congress explicitly directed Interior to administer the 1926 amendments to the 1902 Act, including the above statute, for the purpose of rehabilitating reclamation projects and insuring their future success by placing them on a sound operating and financial basis.”
Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 269 F.3d 1158 (10th Cir. 2001). “Although one provision of the OAA states that the purpose of the act is “the rehabilitation of the several reclamation projects and the insuring of their future success by placing them upon a sound operative and business basis,” 43 U.S.C. § 423f (1994), and directs the DOI to…”
United States v. 277.97 Acres of Land, 112 F. Supp. 159 (S.D. Cal. 1953). “” 43 U.S.C.A. § 423f, Act of May 25, 1926, c.”
Elephant Butte v. DOI (10th Cir. 2008). “The Districts based Count VI on the Secretary’s alleged duty to manage the grazing lands “on a sound operative and business basis” as set out in the Omnibus Adjustment Act of 1926, 43 U.S.C. §423f (OAA). They contended that this statutory language, combined with that of Section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.