U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 20— RESERVATIONS AND GRANTS TO STATES FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES

43 U.S.C. § 853

Selections in Utah to supply deficiencies of school lands

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

All the provisions of sections 851 and 852 of this title, which provide for the selection of lands for educational purposes in lieu of those appropriated for other purposes, are made applicable to the State of Utah, and the grant of school lands to said State, including sections 2 and 32 in each township, and indemnity therefor, shall be administered and adjusted in accordance with the provisions of said sections, anything in the Act approved July 16, 1894, providing for the admission of said State into the Union, to the contrary notwithstanding.

Wherever the words “sections 16 and 36” occur in said sections, the same as applicable to the State of Utah shall read: “sections 2, 16, 32, and 36”, and wherever the words “sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections” occur the same shall read: “second, sixteenth, thirty-second, and thirty-sixth sections”, and wherever the words “sections 16 or 36” occur the same shall read: “sections 2, 16, 32, or 36”, and wherever the words “two sections” occur the same shall read “four sections.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–1980 · leading case: Andrus v. Utah, 446 U.S. 500 (1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Andrus v. Utah, 446 U.S. 500 (1980). · cites it 2× “Title 43 U. S. C. § 853 provides that in applying this statute to Utah, the words "sections sixteen and thirty-six" also include sections two and thirty-two.”
State of Utah, by & Through Its Div. of State Lands v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Individually & as Sec'y of the Interior of the United States, 586 F.2d 756 (10th Cir. 1978). “n list identifying the character and description of both the base lands for which indemnity is sought and the identity of the selected lands that the Secretary proceeds to publish notice providing any adverse claimant of the right to challenge the selections prior to execution…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.