U.S. Code » Title 43 » Chapter CHAPTER 22— RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER EASEMENTS IN PUBLIC LANDS

43 U.S.C. § 931c

Permits, leases, or easements; authorization to grant; payment; limitation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

The head of any department or agency of the Government of the United States having jurisdiction over public lands and national forests, except national parks and monuments, of the United States is authorized to grant permits, leases, or easements, in return for the payment of a price representing the fair market value of such permit, lease, or easement, to be fixed by such head of such department or agency through appraisal, for a period not to exceed thirty years from the date of any such permit, lease, or easement to States, counties, cities, towns, townships, municipal corporations, or other public agencies for the purpose of constructing and maintaining on such lands public buildings or other public works. In the event such lands cease to be used for the purpose for which such permit, lease, or easement was granted, the same shall thereupon terminate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1974–1989 · leading case: Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 521 (Ct. Cl. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 521 (Ct. Cl. 1974). “§ 931c, which, reads as follows: The head of any department or agency of the Government of the United States having jurisdiction over public lands and national forests, except national parks and monuments, of the United ¡States is authorized to grant permits, leases, or…”
Swin Resource Sys., Inc. v. Lycoming Cnty. ex rel. Lycoming Cnty. Solid Waste Dep't, 883 F.2d 245 (3rd Cir. 1989). · cites it 5× “In its complaint filed in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Swin contended that this price difference violated the commerce clause by impermissibly interfering with and discriminating against interstate commerce, denied Swin equal protection of the laws and due process of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.