44 U.S.C. § 103

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 44 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Archivist shall issue at the earliest possible date such regulations as may be necessary to assure the protection of the tape recordings and other materials referred to in section 101 from loss or destruction, and to prevent access to such recordings and materials by unauthorized persons. The Archivist may transfer such recordings and materials to a Presidential archival depository in accordance with section 2112 of title 44, United States Code.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1993 · leading case: Mildred Lewis v. Danford L. Sawyer, Pub. Printer, U.S. Printing Off., 698 F.2d 1261 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mildred Lewis v. Danford L. Sawyer, Pub. Printer, U.S. Printing Off., 698 F.2d 1261 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “, 44 U.S.C. §§ 103 (power to remedy neglect, delay, duplication, waste), 502 (approval of contract work), 505 (regulation of sale of duplicate plates), 509 (fixing standards for paper), 512 (approval of paper contracts), 1914 (approval of measures taken by the Printer to…”

Exec. Bus. Media, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Def., 3 F.3d 759 (4th Cir. 1993). “The DoD regulations governing CE publications were promulgated pursuant to a waiver issued by the Joint Committee on Printing pursuant to 44 U.S.C. §§ 103 and 501. 2 The waiver required the DoD to promulgate regulations providing “for the production of [CE] publications through…”

Applicability of Post-Emp. Restrictions on Dealing With Gov't to Former Employees of the Gov't Printing Off. (OLC 1985). “, 44 U.S.C. § 103 (power to remedy neglect, delay, duplication, and waste); id.”

Constitutionality of Proposed Regulations of Jt. Comm. on Printing (OLC 1984). “The first is 44 U.S.C. § 103 , which allows the JCP to “use any measures it considers necessary to remedy neglect, delay, duplication, or waste in the public printing and binding and the distribution of Government publications.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.