44 U.S.C. § 1502
Custody and publishing of Federal documents; appointment of Director
The Archivist of the United States, acting through the Office of the Federal Register, is charged with the custody and, together with the Director of the Government Publishing Office, with the prompt and uniform publishing of the documents required or authorized to be published by section 1505 of this title. There shall be at the head of the Office a director, appointed by, and who shall act under the general direction of, the Archivist of the United States in carrying out this chapter and the regulations prescribed under it.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2022 · leading case: Ex Parte Medellin, 223 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
Ex Parte Medellin, 223 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). “" as documents that must be published in the Federal Register); 1 C.F.R. § 1.1 ("Document having general applicability and legal effect means any document issued under proper authority prescribing a penalty or course of conduct, conferring a right, privilege, authority, or…”
Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, Am. Iron & Steel Inst., Intervenor, 88 F.3d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “44 U.S.C. § 1502 . Section 2 describes the procedures the OFR must follow in maintaining and publishing documents.”
Humane Soc'y of the United States v. AGRI, 41 F.4th 564 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “44 U.S.C. §§ 1502–1505. Nonetheless, the majority’s entire analysis turns on Section 7 of the Federal Register Act.”
Cresap v. Pac. Inland Navigation Co., 469 P.2d 950 (Wash. Ct. App. 1970). “502 , 44 U.S.C. § 1502 , federal regulations are collected in a single text which is readily available to the public as well as to lawyers and judges.”
United States v. James Ralph Hoyland, 960 F.2d 94 (9th Cir. 1992). “There we held that delegation orders were not among the orders explicitly required to be published by the Federal Register Act, 44 U.S.C. § 1502 et seq. We also held that delegation orders did not fall within the catchall provision of that Act, which requires publication of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.