Notes of Decisions
Matson Navigation Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Transp., 895 F.3d 799 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
· cites it 3× “§ 53102 (b)(1) & (c)(2) ; that it provided foreign commerce or mixed foreign commerce and domestic trade allowed under a registry endorsement, 46 U.S.C. § 12111 , pursuant to the requirements of 46 U.”
Singleton v. United States, 26 F.3d 233 (1st Cir. 1994).
“The harmlessness ruling was based on the conclusion that the MARILYN E was a "vessel of the United States” under 46 U.S.C. § 12111 (c)(1), which provides that "until a certificate of documentation is surrendered with the approval of the Secretary, a documented vessel is deemed…”
United States v. Lebrón-Caceres, 157 F. Supp. 3d 80 (D.P.R. 2016).
“-build” requirements may be issued to vessels to engage in trade with Guam and American Samoa under 46 U.S.C. § 12111 (b). For á documented discussion of different aspects of this subject, including market structure and tradeoffs, costs and benefits of potential changes in…”
Singleton v. United States, 789 F. Supp. 492 (D.P.R. 1992).
· cites it 4× “The statute provides in relevant part of 46 U.S.C. § 12111 (c)(1) that: [U]ntil the certificate of documentation is surrendered with the approval of the Secretary, a documented vessel is deemed to continue to be documented under this chapter for purposes of— (B) sections 9 and…”
Matson Navigation Co. v. Dep't of Transp., No. 2018-2751 (D.D.C. May 30, 2020).
· cites it 7× “mit an MSP contractor to replace an MSP vessel with 2 another vessel, so long as that vessel operates at least in part in foreign commerce; (2) failed to consider the fact that the APL Saipan might not operate exclusively in foreign or mixed foreign and domestic trade due to its…”
Matson Navigation Co. v. Dep't of Transp., No. 2018-2751 (D.D.C. June 12, 2020).
· cites it 7× “mit an MSP contractor to replace an MSP vessel with 2 another vessel, so long as that vessel operates at least in part in foreign commerce; (2) failed to consider the fact that the APL Saipan might not operate exclusively in foreign or mixed foreign and domestic trade due to its…”
Matson Navigation Co. v. DOT, No. 17-1144 (D.C. Cir. July 17, 2018).
· cites it 3× “5 § 53102(b)(1) & (c)(2); that it provided foreign commerce or mixed foreign commerce and domestic trade allowed under a registry endorsement, 46 U.S.C. § 12111 , pursuant to the requirements of 46 U.”
Matson Navigation Co. v. Dep't of Transp., No. 2018-2751 (D.D.C. June 30, 2020).
· cites it 3× “ermit an MSP contractor to replace an MSP vessel with another vessel, so long as that vessel operates at least in part in foreign commerce; (2) failed to consider the fact that the APL Saipan might not operate exclusively in foreign or mixed foreign and domestic trade due to its…”
Matson Navigation Co. v. Dep't of Transp., No. 2022-1975 (D.D.C. Aug. 19, 2022).
“in mixed foreign commerce and domestic trade allowed under a registry endorsement issued under [ 46 U.S.C. § 12111 ]”—that is to say, foreign commerce or mixed foreign commerce and domestic trade with Guam, American Samoa, 9 Wake, Midway, or Kingman Reef.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.