47 U.S.C. § 305
LOCAL NETWORK CHANNEL BROADCAST REPORTS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1964–2026 · leading case: Huawei Tech USA v. FCC, 2 F.4th 421 (5th Cir. 2021).
Huawei Tech USA v. FCC, 2 F.4th 421 (5th Cir. 2021). “” Specifically, it cites 47 U.S.C. §§ 305 (c), 308(a), and 606(c)–(d).”
United States v. Borgese, 235 F. Supp. 286 (S.D.N.Y. 1964). “The short answer is that 47 U.S.C. § 305 specifically exempts government “radio stations” from any licensing requirement.”
Auth. of Nat'l Telecomm. & Info. Admin. to Monitor Radio Commc'ns (OLC 1980). “F o r the reasons we state below, w e believe that, with one exception, N T IA may conduct these m onitoring activities to the extent they are reasonably necessary to discharge N T IA ’s statutory functions under 47 U.S.C. § 305 (a) and 15 U.S.C. §272 (12) & (13).”
Rust Broad. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 379 F.2d 480 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “The Commission has no jurisdiction to regulate the VOA facility, 47 U.S.C. § 305 (a), but has made repeated requests to the Executive to examine the VOA operation.”
Ligado Networks LLC v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2026). “” Complaint at ¶ 22 (citing 47 U.S.C. §§ 305 (a), 902(b)(2)(A)). The com- plaint reiterates that, while the “FCC and NTIA coordinate with each other and with other federal stakeholders through the Interdepartmental Radio Advisory Commit- tee,” “the FCC is the only federal agency…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.