48 U.S.C. § 2
Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, § 53, 70A Stat. 641
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2023 · leading case: Pr Recovery & Dev. Jv, LLC v. Carrasquillo De Jesus, Rebecca I, No. KLAN202300260 (June 30, 2023).
Pr Recovery & Dev. Jv, LLC v. Carrasquillo De Jesus, Rebecca I, No. KLAN202300260 (June 30, 2023). “48 U.S.C. §2 144. […]40 -III- En síntesis, la apelante impugna la capacidad de PRRD para cobrar las cantidades reclamadas por varias razones.”
Atesom v. Guam Mem'l Hosp. Auth., No. 1:15-cv-00038 (D. Guam Mar. 2, 2016). “]” 48 U.S.C. § 2 1921c(e)(6). 3 The Plaintiff argues that she and the proposed class have rights that are “derivative” of this 4 treaty because they are “third party beneficiaries” of the Compact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.