48 U.S.C. § 234

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 48 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Title to the property of the Government of the United States situated in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands and in Palau or acquired for or used by the Government of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands on or before the day preceding the effective date of this Compact shall, without reimbursement or transfer of funds, vest in the Government of Palau as set forth in a separate agreement which shall come into effect simultaneously with this Compact. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to the personal property of the Government of the United States for which the Government of the United States determines a continuing requirement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1925–1954 · leading case: Hotch v. United States, 208 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1954).
Hotch v. United States, 208 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1954). · cites it 4× “* * * ” Title 48 U.S.C.A. § 234 , June 26, 1906, c. 3547, § 5, 34 Stat.”
Hotch v. United States, 212 F.2d 280 (9th Cir. 1954). “In the instant case, neither the statute fixing closed- periods, Title 48 U.S.C.A. § 234 , nor the proposed regulations extending the statutory closed period (see Title 50 C.”
P. E. Harris & Co. v. Mullaney, 87 F. Supp. 248 (D. Alaska 1949). · cites it 2× “48 U.S.C.A. § 234 . It is so placed as to intercept any run of salmon along or near the shore.”
United States v. Hotch, 107 F. Supp. 159 (D. Alaska 1952). “* * *” 48 U.S.C.A. § 234 : “It shall be unlawful to fish for, take, or kill any salmon of any species in any manner or 'by any means except by hand rod, spear, or gaff for personal use and not for sale or barter, and except by hook and line for either personal or commercial use,…”
United States v. One Floating Fish Trap, 7 Alaska 334 (D. Alaska 1925). “*337 The section of the statute alleged in the information to have been violated is section S of the Act of Congress of June 26, 1906, as amended by the Act of June 6, 1924 (48 USCA § 234 [U. S. Comp. St. § 3632]), and reads as follows: “Sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.