48 U.S.C. § 341
“Any citizen of Palau entitled to the privileges of Section 141 of this Compact shall be eligible to volunteer for service in the Armed Forces of the United States, but shall not be subject to involuntary induction into military service of the United States so long as such person does not establish habitual residence in the United States, its territories or possessions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1952–1971 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Hardin, 325 F. Supp. 99 (D. Alaska 1971).
Sierra Club v. Hardin, 325 F. Supp. 99 (D. Alaska 1971). “§ 497 (1960) and 48 U.S.C.A. § 341 (1952). This issue has been mooted by the withdrawal of the permit in favor of “Conditions of Use” pending the completion of the mill and the issuance of a patent to the land.”
S. Idaho Conf. Ass'n of Seventh Day Adventists, a Corp. v. United States, 418 F.2d 411 (7th Cir. 1969). “We agreed with the trial court that “this was a valid 'special use permit’ authorized by 48 U.S. C.A. § 341 9 and 23 U.S.C.A. § 19 , 10 and regulations issued pursuant thereto, and it had the effect of withdrawing the area in dispute from mineral location at the time the…”
United States v. Schaub, 103 F. Supp. 873 (D. Alaska 1952). “, which regulations were in turn promulgated under 48 U.S.C.A. § 341 and 23 U.S.C.A. § 18 , the later of which authorizes the appropriation of any part of the public lands or reservations of the United States as a source of material for the construction or maintenance of forest…”
Schaub v. United States, 207 F.2d 325 (9th Cir. 1953). “” The trial court held that this was a valid “special use permit” authorized by 48 U.S.C.A. § 341 and 23 U.S.C.A. § 18 , and regulations issued pursuant thereto, and that it had the effect of withdrawing the area in dispute from mineral location at the time the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.