U.S. Code » Title 48 » Chapter CHAPTER 3— HAWAII

48 U.S.C. § 645

Repealed. Pub. L. 86–3, § 14(f), Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 10

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 48 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1947–1958 · leading case: Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, 336 U.S. 368 (1949).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, 336 U.S. 368 (1949). “See 48 U. S. C. § 645 . Since this appeal was taken, the revision of the United States Code, Title 28, §§ 1291, 1294, has become effective.”
Armando A. Miranda v. United States, 255 F.2d 9 (1st Cir. 1958). “By the same Act which enacted revised title 28, section 86 of the Hawaiian Organic Act of April 30, 1900, 48 U.S.C.A. § 645 , which had established the federal district court in Hawaii, had provided for the appointment of its judges and had given it the “jurisdiction of district…”
Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Ackerman, 82 F. Supp. 65 (D. Haw. 1949). “” 54 To read as follows: “The laws of the United States relating to removal of causes, appeals and other matters and proceedings as between the courts of the United States and the courts of the several States shall govern in such matters and proceedings as between the courts of…”
Alesna v. Rice, 172 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1949). · cites it 2× “§ 642 , provides that the United -States District Court for the District of Hawaii “shall have the jurisdiction fo district courts of the United States, * * Section 86 (d) of the Hawaiian Organic Act, 48 U.S.C. § 645 , 48 U.S.C.A. § 645 , contains the following: “The laws of the…”
Alesna v. Rice, 69 F. Supp. 897 (D. Haw. 1947). · cites it 2× “District Court for the Territory of Hawaii, 48 U.S.C.A. § 645 . As pointed out in Wilder’s Steamship Co.”
Hall v. Hawaiian Pineapple Co., 72 F. Supp. 533 (D. Haw. 1947). “So many times within the Judicial Code Hawaii and this Court are neither fish nor fowl that it is hard to be sure of the answer until the Supreme Court has spoken.”
Queen Ins. Co. of Am., a Corp. v. Ivan W. Larson & Elwood W. Buck, Doing Bus. as Larson & Buck Glass Co., 225 F.2d 46 (9th Cir. 1955). “§§ 1332 , 1441-1450 ; 48 U.S.C.A. § 645 . 2 . See Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.