U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE IV— INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION › Part PART A— RAIL › Chapter CHAPTER 107— RATES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— LIMITATIONS

49 U.S.C. § 10742

Facilities for interchange of traffic

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

A rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part shall provide reasonable, proper, and equal facilities that are within its power to provide for the interchange of traffic between, and for the receiving, forwarding, and delivering of passengers and property to and from, its respective line and a connecting line of another rail carrier or of a water carrier providing transportation subject to chapter 137.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 69 F.3d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 69 F.3d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “Although the old formula approach had not produced the intended results, in a market with mandatory interchange, see 49 U.S.C. § 10742 (1988), the Commission could not be certain about the “market” results under deprescription.”
Black v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 837 F.2d 1175 (D.C. Cir. 1988). · cites it 3× “” We sustain the Commission’s determination that the interchange arrangement in this case did not require Commission approval.”
Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v. STB, 20 F.4th 292 (7th Cir. 2021). “The governing statute is 49 U.S.C. §10742 , which provides: “A rail carrier providing transporta- tion subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part shall provide reasonable, proper, and equal facilities that are within its power to provide for the interchange of…”
Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v. STB, No. 24-1484 (7th Cir. Dec. 11, 2024). “We remanded after concluding that the Board had misinter- preted 49 U.S.C. §10742 , which permits a rail carrier to designate “rea- sonable” facilities “that are within its power to provide”.”
Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. United States & the Interstate Com. Comm'n, 731 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “” 49 U.S.C. § 10742 (Supp. V 1981). Petitioner alleges that this provision entitles it to a free route over B & OCT tracks to a designated point of interchange with the B & O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.