49 U.S.C. § 11144
Records: form; inspection; preservation
A prior section 11144, Pub. L. 95–473,
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1980–1987 · leading case: United States v. Grand Trunk W. R.R., 95 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Mich. 1981).
United States v. Grand Trunk W. R.R., 95 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Mich. 1981). “§ 20 (5), now found in 49 U.S.C. § 11144 (b) (1978). The new version of this statute substitutes “[t]he Commission, or an employee designated by the Commission,” for “[t]he Commission or any duly authorized special agent, accountant, or examiner thereof.”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. James R. Gould, Doing Bus. as Brokers for Agric. Cooperativeassociations, 629 F.2d 847 (3rd Cir. 1980). “These requests were made pursuant to section 11144(b), as well as ICA § 220(g), 49 U.S.C.A. § 11144 (c) (West Supp.1980).”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Piggy Back Shippers Ass'n of Florida, Inc., 704 F.2d 533 (11th Cir. 1983). “By statute, 49 U.S.C.A. § 11144 , the ICC has broad investigatory powers, which allow ICC employees to inspect records and facilities of regulated entities.”
State v. Huston, 445 So. 2d 67 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “49 U.S.C. § 11144 (1982). Since a warrantless search and seizure occurred in this case, the burden is on the State to show that this action was justified under an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Art.”
United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 691 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1982). “The controlling statutory provision is 49 U.S.C. § 11144 (b)(2), which reads as follows: (b) The Commission, or an employee designated by the Commission, may on demand and display of proper credentials— (2) inspect and copy any record of— (A) a carrier, broker, lessor, or…”
Seaboard Sys. R.R. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 827 F.2d 699 (11th Cir. 1987). “Finding that the district court erroneously interpreted the scope of the ICC’s summary inspection power under 49 U.S.C. § 11144 (1982), 1 we reverse the decision below.”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Peninsula Shippers Ass'n, Inc., 789 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1986). “The ICC alleged that 49 U.S.C. § 11144 (b) authorized a summary inspection of PSA’s records to determine whether PSA was in fact subject to ICC regulation.”
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Gould, 522 F. Supp. 740 (W.D. Pa. 1981). “The visitorial powers of an ICC investigator, as set forth in 49 U.S.C. § 11144 (b), (1981), authorizes the inspection and copying of any transportation-related record as well as lands, buildings and equipment.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 11144(b) — 1 case
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. James R. Gould, Doing Bus. as Brokers for Agric. Cooperativeassociations, 629 F.2d 847 (3rd Cir. 1980). “These requests were made pursuant to section 11144(b), as well as ICA § 220(g), 49 U.S.C.A. § 11144 (c) (West Supp.1980).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.