49 U.S.C. § 11162

Rail carrier cost accounting system

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each rail carrier shall have and maintain a cost accounting system that is in compliance with the rules promulgated by the Board under section 11161 of this title. A rail carrier may, after notifying the Board, make modifications in such system unless, within 60 days after the date of notification, the Board finds such modifications to be inconsistent with the rules promulgated by the Board under section 11161 of this title.(b) For purposes of determining whether the cost accounting system of a rail carrier is in compliance with the rules promulgated by the Board, the Board shall have the right to examine and make copies of any documents, papers, or records of such rail carrier relating to compliance with such rules. Such documents, papers, and records (and any copies thereof) shall not be subject to the mandatory disclosure requirements of section 552 of title 5.(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, § 102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 836.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11164 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a).

A prior section 11162, added Pub. L. 96–448, title III, § 302(a), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1935; amended Pub. L. 103–272, § 4(j)(30), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1370, related to cost accounting principles, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: Edison Elec. Inst. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 969 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Edison Elec. Inst. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 969 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “” See 49 U.S.C. § 11162 (a). The RAPB concluded that including a productivity adjustment in the RCAF was both feasible and desireable.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.