U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE II— OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES › Chapter CHAPTER 13— SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— ADMINISTRATIVE

49 U.S.C. § 1324

Service of process in court proceedings

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Designation of Agent.—A carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under subtitle IV shall designate an agent on whom service of process in an action before a district court may be made. Except as otherwise provided, process in an action before a district court shall be served on the designated agent of that carrier at the office or usual place of residence of that agent. If the carrier does not have a designated agent, service may be made by posting the notice in the office of the Board.(b)Changing Designation.—A designation under this section may be changed at any time in the same manner as originally made.(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title II, § 201(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 937, § 724; renumbered § 1324 and amended Pub. L. 114–110, §§ 3(a)(5), 8(b), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2228, 2232.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–110, § 3(a)(3), renumbered section 724 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–110, § 8(b), struck out “in the District of Columbia” after “designate an agent” and “usual place of residence”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1960–1985 · leading case: Thorpe v. Hous. Auth. of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thorpe v. Hous. Auth. of Durham, 393 U.S. 268 (1969). · cites it 2× “743 , 49 U. S. C. § 1324 (a) (Civil Aeronautics Board); 49 Stat.”
Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 409 U.S. 363 (1973). · cites it 2× “Section 204 (a), 49 U. S. C. § 1324 (a), authorizes the Board to issue and amend such orders as it shall deem necessary *383 to carry out the provisions of and to exercise and perform its powers and duties under the statute.”
Ravreby v. United Airlines, Inc., 293 N.W.2d 260 (Iowa 1980). · cites it 2× “49 U.S.C. § 1324 (1976); Freeman, State Regulation of Airlines and the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, 44 J.”
City of Oakland v. Nutter, 13 Cal. App. 3d 752 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 2× “) The regulations issued under the law governing the federal aviation program (see 49 U.S.C. § 1324 , subd. (a), § 1348, subd.”
United Air Lines, Inc., British Airways Plc, Intervening v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., Frontier Airlines, Inc., Intervening, 766 F.2d 1107 (7th Cir. 1985). “The provision of the Act that empowers the Board to make rules, section 204(a), 49 U.S.C. § 1324 (a), empowers it to make only rules “pursuant to and consistent with the provisions of” the Act.”
Wood v. City of Huntsville, 384 So. 2d 1081 (Ala. 1980). “49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1324 (b), 1343 (i). Garden State Farms, Inc.”
Deutsche Lufthansa Aktienge-Sellschaft v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 479 F.2d 912 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “49 U.S.C. § 1324 (a) : General powers ‘and duties of the Board —Performance of acts; conduct of investigations ; orders, rules, regulations, and procedure.”
Info. Control Corp. v. United Airlines Corp., 73 Cal. App. 3d 630 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977). “2 Under section 204 of the Aviation Act ( 49 U.S.C.A. § 1324 ), the board is empowered to make rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of the act.”
Fed. Mar. Comm'n v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Co., Ltd., 335 F.2d 255 (9th Cir. 1964). “§ 17 (3) (Interstate Commerce Commission); 49 U.S.C. § 1324 (a) (Civil Aeronautics Board); 16 U.”
Capitol Int'l Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 392 F.2d 511 (D.C. Cir. 1968). · cites it 2× “837 , 49 U.S.C. § 1324 (1964). 4 At the threshold of this point, we are confronted with a semantic problem occurring frequently in administrative agencies as to the action described by the denial of a motion to review.”
Bratton v. Shiffrin, 440 F. Supp. 1257 (N.D. Ill. 1977). “49 U.S.C. § 1324 (a) (1970). In light of this broad statutory authority, we find that Regulations 378.”
Moss v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 521 F.2d 298 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “In fact the power to do so seems amply embraced within the Board’s powers to “conduct such investigations .”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.