49 U.S.C. § 13502
Exempt transportation between Alaska and other States
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10522 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, § 102(a).
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2021 · leading case: Musarra v. Digit. Dish, Inc., 454 F. Supp. 2d 692 (S.D. Ohio 2006).
Musarra v. Digit. Dish, Inc., 454 F. Supp. 2d 692 (S.D. Ohio 2006). “49 U.S.C. § 13502 relates to transportation that occurs between Alaska and other states, and, therefore, is irrelevant to this Court’s analysis of whether the MCA exemption applies to both motor carriers and motor private carriers.”
Walters v. Am. Coach Lines of Miami, Inc., 575 F.3d 1221 (11th Cir. 2009). “This reading is supported by the fact that § 31502(a) also cites 49 U.S.C. § 13502 , which contains a specific carve-out from the Secretary’s jurisdiction for transportation between Alaska and other states that occurs in a foreign country, but does not reference any other…”
Herman v. Héctor I. Nieves Transp., Inc., 244 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 2001). “49 U.S.C. § 13502 provides for an exemption "to the extent that transportation [is] between a place in Alaska and a place in another state.”
Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc., 333 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “The statute exempts several specific forms of transportation that would otherwise fall with the FMCA's reach, 49 U.S.C. §§ 13502 - 13506, but the main exemption relevant here is that related to-transportation of passengers by motor vehicle incidental to transportation by…”
Serna v. Pettey Leach Trucking, Inc., 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6866 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003). “§ 13101 (a)(2)), and the Board has jurisdiction over the transportation of property by motor carrier between a place in one state and a place in another state.”
King v. Asset Appraisal Servs., Inc., 470 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2006). “49 U.S.C. § 13502 pertains to transportation between Alaska and other states.”
Minor v. Cent. Forest Prods. Inc (N.D. Ala. 2021). “Circuit courts also have not interpreted the statute to limit the Secretary’s 76 The statute cited in text addresses motor carrier and private motor carrier requirements, and provides that: “The Secretary of Transportation may prescribe requirements for . . . (1) qualifications…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.