49 U.S.C. § 13712

Government traffic

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

A carrier providing transportation or service for the United States Government may transport property or individuals for the United States Government without charge or at a rate reduced from the applicable commercial rate. Section 6101(b) to (d) of title 41 does not apply when transportation for the United States Government can be obtained from a carrier lawfully operating in the area where the transportation would be provided.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Inter-Coastal Xpress, Inc. v. United States, 296 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Inter-Coastal Xpress, Inc. v. United States, 296 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2002). · cites it 6× “) Section 10721 of the ICA, now re-codified aiT 49 U.S.C. § 13712 , generally exempts transportation-services agreements from the procurement procedures that ordinarily apply to other government contracts.”

Munitions Carriers Conf., Inc. v. United States, 147 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1998). · cites it 3× “§ 22 (1887) (now codified in revised form at 49 U.S.C. § 13712 (Supp. I 1995)); Howe, 622 F.”

Inter-Coastal Xpress, Inc. v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 531 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “49 U.S.C. § 13712 (Supp. I 1995). Because the parties did not rely on other “appropriate regulatory authority” for performance of the contracts, and due to the generally broad jurisdiction of the ICA over transportation services, it is clear that the tender agreements…”

Cent. Transp. Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed. Cl. 336 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “At oral argument Plaintiff cited 49 U.S.C. §§ 13712 and 13706, arguing that both mandate payment of charges to Central.”

Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. United States, 39 Fed. Cl. 485 (Fed. Cl. 1997). “Amended 49 U.S.C. § 13712 . . See 140 Ct.Cl. — Rules—Forward iii.”

Allen v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2018). “§ 10721or 49 U.S.C. § 13712 [ICA].”) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.