49 U.S.C. § 41715

Phase-out of slot rules at certain airports

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Termination.—The rules contained in subparts S and K of part 93, title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply—(1) after July 1, 2002, at Chicago O’Hare International Airport; and(2) after January 1, 2007, at LaGuardia Airport or John F. Kennedy International Airport.(b)Statutory Construction.—Nothing in this section and sections 41714 and 41716–41718 shall be construed—(1) as affecting the Federal Aviation Administration’s authority for safety and the movement of air traffic; and(2) as affecting any other authority of the Secretary to grant exemptions under section 41714.(c)Factors To Consider.—(1)In general.—Before the award of slot exemptions under sections 41714 and 41716–41718, the Secretary of Transportation may consider, among other determining factors, whether the petitioning air carrier’s proposal provides the maximum benefit to the United States economy, including the number of United States jobs created by the air carrier, its suppliers, and related activities. The Secretary should give equal consideration to the consumer benefits associated with the award of such exemptions.(2)Applicability.—Paragraph (1) does not apply in any case in which the air carrier requesting the slot exemption is proposing to use under the exemption a type of aircraft for which there is not a competing United States manufacturer.(Added Pub. L. 106–181, title II, § 231(b)(2), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 108.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 41715 was renumbered section 41719 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendments note under section 106 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Exhaustless Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 931 F.3d 1209 (D.C. Cir. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Exhaustless Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 931 F.3d 1209 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “49 U.S.C. § 41715 (a). For the period leading up to that date, Congress directed the FAA to grant slot exemptions for carriers servicing smaller airports and carriers with little or no existing service at the airports.”

Repub. Airline Inc. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 669 F.3d 296 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “61 , 108 (2000) (codified at 49 U.S.C. § 41715 (a)). 3 . Although, as DOT notes, Reno Air is "not a [s]ection 41714(j) DOT precedent, as it arose prior to enactment of the statute,” Respondent’s Br.”

City of New York v. Minetta, 262 F.3d 169 (2d Cir. 2001). “), phases out the HDR at LaGuardia and Kennedy as of January 1, 2007, see 49 U.S.C. § 41715 (a)(2). The Act provides interim slot rules to allow new entrants to offer services at the two airports until that date.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.