49 U.S.C. § 106
REPORTS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Abbey v. United States, 745 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Abbey v. United States, 745 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “The Act added the following to 49 U.S.C. § 106 (l): Except as provided in [subsections (a) and (g) of section 40122], the Administrator is authorized, in the performance of the functions of the Adminis- trator, to appoint, transfer, and fix the compensa- tion of such officers…”
Abbey v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 722 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “Plaintiffs are 7,438 current and former employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), an organization within the United States Department of Transportation (DOT), 49 U.S.C. § 106 (a), classified as Air Traffic Control Specialists (ATCS), Traffic Management Coordinators…”
Nat'l Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n AFL-CIO v. Fed. Serv. Impasses Panel, 437 F.3d 1256 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “According to the FAA, “business as usual” changed when Congress enacted 49 U.S.C. § 106 ^) in October 1996. The FAA argues that, “[ujnder 49 U.”
Flyers Rights Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 864 F.3d 738 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “See 49 U.S.C. § 106 (f)(3)(A); 14 C.F.R. § 11.”
Whalen v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 579 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “3213 , 3232 (1996) (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. § 106 (i )(1)). The parties urge the court to follow two different methods of statutory construction in determining the FAA’s ability to use portions of Title 5 in its personnel management system.”
Jorge Rojas v. Faa, 989 F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 2021). “49 U.S.C. § 106 . It has a cadre of lawyers in its chief counsel’s office.”
Balloons Over the Rainbow, Inc. v. Dir. of Revenue, 427 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. 2014). “at 1278-80; see also 49 U.S.C. § 106 (g). Like the AHTA, the FAA is codified under subtitle VII and is governed by the definitions in § 40102.”
Diana L. Alinsky, Individually & as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Paul Alinsky, Deceased v. United States, 415 F.3d 639 (7th Cir. 2005). “Rather, the FAA relies on several other statutory grants of authority, such as 49 U.S.C. § 106 (l)(6), which provides: The Administrator is authorized to enter into and perform such contracts .”
Rolly Weldon Hill v. The Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. & Donald D. Engen, Adm'r, Fed. Aviation Admin., 886 F.2d 1275 (10th Cir. 1989). “’’ 49 U.S.C. § 106 (g). The powers exercised by the FAA in this case — the rulemaking powers under § 307 (49 U.”
Waters v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 158 F. Supp. 2d 415 (D.N.J. 2001). “By its terms, then, ACAA did not apply to foreign air carriers until the effective date of the amendment, which according to the text of Pub.”
Anna Botz, Formerly Known as Anna Hollenkamp v. Omni Air Int'l, 286 F.3d 488 (8th Cir. 2002). “The excerpt from the Minnesota whistle-blower statute set forth below includes the two paragraphs that Omni allegedly violated. An employer shall not discharge, discipline, threaten, otherwise discriminate against, or penalize an employee regarding the employee’s compensation,…”
Avia Dynamics, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 641 F.3d 515 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “49 U.S.C. § 106 (a). 2 . A current limiter is a device that regulates electrical current in order to reduce the risk of short-circuit, loss of power or fire.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 106(g) — 1 case
Balloons Over the Rainbow, Inc. v. Dir. of Revenue, 427 S.W.3d 815 (Mo. 2014). “at 1278-80; see also 49 U.S.C. § 106 (g). Like the AHTA, the FAA is codified under subtitle VII and is governed by the definitions in § 40102.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.