49 U.S.C. § 45101

Definition

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar

In this chapter, “controlled substance” means any substance under section 102 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 802) specified by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2002–2006 · leading case: Philip J. Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc., Delta Airlines Inc., 314 F.3d 195 (5th Cir. 2002).
Philip J. Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc., Delta Airlines Inc., 314 F.3d 195 (5th Cir. 2002). “952, 952-956 (1991) (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. §§ 45101 ^45106). One provision permitted the FAA to “continu[e] in effect” pre-exist-ing drug testing regulations.”
Drake v. Lab'y Corp. of Am. Holdings, 458 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2006). “952 (1991) (codified in relevant part as amended at 49 U.S.C. §§ 45101 et seq.) (the “OTETA”), and by FAA regulations governing drug testing, 14 C.”
Fifie v. Cooksey, 403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (M.D. Fla. 2005). “Airline provisions are codified in 49 U.S.C. § 45101 et seq. Trucking provisions are codified at 49 U.”
Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc (5th Cir. 2002). “952, 952-956 (1991) (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. §§ 45101 - 45106). One provision permitted the FAA to “continu[e] in effect” pre-existing drug testing regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.