5 U.S.C. § 2906
Oath; custody
The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court to which the office pertains.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: United States v. Conces, 507 F.3d 1028 (6th Cir. 2007).
United States v. Conces, 507 F.3d 1028 (6th Cir. 2007). “” Yet, the statutes upon which he principally relied in advancing this same jurisdictional challenge in the court below, 5 U.S.C. §§ 2906 and 3331, 12 apply by their terms only to individuals “elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed…”
Nabaya v. Dudeck, 38 F. Supp. 3d 86 (D.D.C. 2014). “The plaintiff primarily relies on 5 U.S.C. § 2906 , which states that "[t]he oath of office taken by an individual .”
Miller v. Johnson, 541 F. Supp. 1165 (D.D.C. 1982). “Plaintiffs cite 5 U.S.C. § 2906 (1976) as requiring a district judge to file a copy of his oath at their request.”
Ass'n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. Clinton, 997 F.2d 898 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “§ 3331 (officers of the United States required to swear an oath); 5 U.S.C. § 2906 (officers’ oath to be “preserved”); 5 U.”
In Re: Hubbard, 226 F. App'x 109 (3rd Cir. 2007). “05-cr-0021-G-01 to comply with 5 U.S.C. § 2906 (“The oath of office taken by an individual under section 3331 of this title shall be delivered by him to, and preserved by, the House of Congress, agency, or court to which the office pertains.”
Brown v. Newey (D. Utah 2023). “He maintains that absent proof of her oath, which she is apparently required to provide pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 2906 , the court must assume that Judge Romero was “impersonating a federal officer.”
Nabaya v. Aber (D.D.C. 2018). “5 (noting that 5 U.S.C. § 2906 requires only that the Department of Justice retain a copy of its employees’ oath of office).”
United States v. Conces (6th Cir. 2007). “” Yet, the statutes upon which he principally relied in advancing this same jurisdictional challenge in the court below, 5 U.S.C. §§ 2906 and 3331,12 apply by their terms only to individuals “elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.