5 U.S.C. § 305
The Commission shall prescribe regulations necessary for the administration of the foregoing provisions of this Act [enacting section 5550a of this title and this note].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1939–2026 · leading case: David Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 48 F.4th 282 (4th Cir. 2022).
David Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 48 F.4th 282 (4th Cir. 2022). “The TVA is also exempt from many rules that govern other federal agencies, including civil service laws, TVA Act, § 3, purchasing requirements, § 9, and systematic review under 5 U.S.C. § 305 (a)(2), (b) (“[E]ach agency shall review systematically the operations of each of its…”
Int'l Graphics, Div. of Moore Bus. Forms, Inc. v. United States, 4 Cl. Ct. 186 (Ct. Cl. 1983). “20,556 (1979), ¶ 1; 5 U.S.C. § 305 (1979); 41 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.”
SGA Fin. Corp. v. United States Small Bus. Admin., 509 F. Supp. 392 (D.N.J. 1981). “Statutory authority for these regulations was derived from the government organization provisions of Title 5, which give the heads of executive and military departments general authority to prescribe regulations for the conduct of its business and management of its employees, 5…”
Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 (3rd Cir. 1979). “5 U.S.C. § 305 (1976). . - U.S. at -, 99 S.”
Rusnak v. United States of Am. (D.D.C. 2026). “, 5 U.S.C. § 305 , but it gave the term a distinct meaning in the APA, see Rusnak, ECF No.”
Jurisdiction & Procedure of the Off. of the Assistant Solicitor Gen. (OLC 1939). “Opinions ordinarily are published, as provided by law ( 5 U.S.C. § 305 ), unless they relate to matters deemed confidential or amount to mere practical suggestions or informal advice of little or no value as a precedent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.