5 U.S.C. § 306
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1938–2005 · leading case: Booth v. Fletcher, 101 F.2d 676 (D.C. Cir. 1938).
Booth v. Fletcher, 101 F.2d 676 (D.C. Cir. 1938). “§ 361, 5 U.S.C.A. § 306 , 2 F.C.A. Title 5, § 306; R.”
Fund for Animals v. Williams, 391 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D.D.C. 2005). “(citing 5 U.S.C. § 306 ). The FWS 2000-2005 Strategic Plan identifies fourteen long-term goals for the agency.”
United States Ex Rel. R. Rudnick & Co. v. Daniel, Urbahn, Seelye & Fuller, 357 F. Supp. 853 (N.D. Ill. 1973). “That section was enacted in 1966 and was derived from 5 U.S.C. § 306 (1964), which was limited in scope to proceedings only in the Supreme Court and the Court of Claims and which provided, in relevant part: The officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the…”
Weiss, 155 Ct. Cl. 825 (Ct. Cl. 1961). “* * * *849 Defendant urges tbat “[T]he doctrine of waiver enunciated in * * * Fireman's Fund * * * is antagonistic to the requirements of pertinent sections of the United States Code * * * [viz] 5 U.S.C. § 306 , 5 U.S.C. § 91 , and 28 U.”
United States v. Nothern Pac. Ry. Co., 41 F. Supp. 273 (E.D. Wash. 1941). “5 U.S.C.A. § 306 , R.S. § 361. 5 U.S.C.A.”
Litig. Responsibility of the Attorney Gen. in Cases in the Int'l Court of Just. (OLC 1980). “5 U.S.C. § 306 (1964). 3 T he effect and relevance o f the early practice cited is not clear since, with the establishment of the D epartm ent o f Justice in 1870, the A ttorney G eneral assumed responsibility for the legal w ork o f the D epartm ent o f State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.