5 U.S.C. § 315
Advisory Committee on Data for Evidence Building
Section effective 180 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1928–1995 · leading case: United States v. Crispino, 392 F. Supp. 764 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).
United States v. Crispino, 392 F. Supp. 764 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). “(1873), and 5 U.S.C. § 315 , and currently codified at 28 U.”
United States v. Goldman, 28 F.2d 424 (D. Conn. 1928). “”- 5 USCA § 315. Prom these provisions it is clear that special assistants, appointed under the authority of these provisions, are limited in their functions to assisting the local United States district attorney in the trial of eases.”
Sutherland v. Int'l Ins. Co. of New York, 43 F.2d 969 (2d Cir. 1930). “Code, § 315 [5 USCA § 315]). While this statute does not in terms forbid any officer of the United States to appear by a private attorney in a civil actiqn, we understand the practice of the departments to have been uniform, or nearly so, not to do- so, and the courts have…”
United States v. 1,960 Acres of Land, 54 F. Supp. 867 (S.D. Cal. 1944). “” Now 5 U.S.C.A. § 315 . The Attorney General could (By Sec.”
United States v. Hooper Enloe Denton, United States of Am. v. Omer Clarence Phillips, United States of Am. v. Billy Webb, 307 F.2d 336 (6th Cir. 1962). “Title 5 U.S.C.A. § 315 . If the United States appear in a cause only through a special assistant, who has no authority, then the United States as a party may not be properly in court.”
United States v. Theodore S. Forman, 71 F.3d 1214 (6th Cir. 1995). “§ 515 (b) was formerly codified at 5 U.S.C. § 315 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.