5 U.S.C. § 3330
Government-wide list of vacant positions
2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted “Government Accountability Office” for “General Accounting Office”.
1996—Pub. L. 104–106, which directed renumbering of the section 3329 of this title that was added by Pub. L. 102–484, § 4431, as section 3330 of this title, could not be executed because of the intervening renumbering of that section by Pub. L. 104–52, § 4(1)(A). See 1995 Amendment note below.
1995—Pub. L. 104–52, § 4(1)(A), renumbered section 3329 of this title, relating to government-wide list of vacant positions, as this section.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–52, § 4(1)(B), added subsec. (f).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: Riller v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 818 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Riller v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 818 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2016). “But the MSPB must assure that the veteran’s experience and work history were actually considered.”
Joseph v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 505 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “After unsuccessfully challenging his non-appointment before the Department of Labor, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(1), as violating his veterans’ preference rights, Joseph appealed his non-selection to the Board.”
Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 288 F. Supp. 3d 293 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “§ 2108 ; 5 U.S.C. § 3330 ; 2 5 U.S.C. § 7203 ; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; criminal statutes dealing with false statements ( 18 U.”
Patterson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 111 F. App'x 590 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “See Veterans Employment Opportunity Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a) (2000). Mr. Patterson further complained of discrimination forbidden by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERA), 38 U.”
Dean v. Dep't of the Air Force, 592 F. App'x 923 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “See 5 U.S.C. § 3330 ; 5 C.F.R. §§ 330.101-330.”
Young v. Fed. Mediation & Conciliation Serv., 66 F. App'x 858 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “He states that the applicable law is 5 U.S.C. § 3330 [sic: § 3330a] (a)(1), (2)(A-B) and (3) of the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998, and requests “immediate hiring to the applied for position” and other reme *860 dies.”
Demery v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2025). “Dem- ery failed to file her complaint with the Department of La- bor within the 60-day statutory period under 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(2)(A). Because the Board did not err in finding that Ms.”
Miller v. Fdic (Fed. Cir. 2016). “5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a). Under 5 U.S.C. § 3311 (2), when experi- ence is a factor in determining eligibility, preference eligible veterans are entitled to “credit” “for all experience material to the position.”
Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior (D.D.C. 2018). “§ 2108 ; 5 U.S.C. § 3330 ;2 5 U.S.C. § 7203 ; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; criminal statutes dealing with false statements ( 18 U.”
Jolley v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2018). “Among the requirements was 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(1)(A)’s JOLLEY v. MSPB 5 need for the appellant to establish that he exhausted his Department of Labor administrative remedy before bring- ing an appeal to the Board.”
Richard Lee v. Dep't of Com. (MSPB 2024). “371 , ¶¶ 8-13 (2009) (applying the holding in Kirkendall and stating that the 60-day time limit for filing a complaint with the Secretary of Labor under 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(2)(A) is not jurisdictional and is subject to equitable tolling).”
Demery v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2025). “MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________ Decided: November 4, 2025 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page 3, change “5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A)” to “U.S.C. § 3330a(a)(2)(A)” On page 3, change “31–35” to…”
— 5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A) — 1 case
Demery v. MSPB (Fed. Cir. 2025). “MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________ Decided: November 4, 2025 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page 3, change “5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A)” to “U.S.C. § 3330a(a)(2)(A)” On page 3, change “31–35” to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.