U.S. Code
»
Title 5
» Part PART III— EMPLOYEES › Subpart Subpart B— Employment and Retention › Chapter CHAPTER 33— EXAMINATION, SELECTION, AND PLACEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— EXAMINATION, CERTIFICATION, AND APPOINTMENT
Notes of Decisions
Riller v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 818 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
“But the MSPB must assure that the veteran’s experience and work history were actually considered.”
Joseph v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 505 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
“After unsuccessfully challenging his non-appointment before the Department of Labor, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(1), as violating his veterans’ preference rights, Joseph appealed his non-selection to the Board.”
Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 288 F. Supp. 3d 293 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“§ 2108 ; 5 U.S.C. § 3330 ; 2 5 U.S.C. § 7203 ; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; criminal statutes dealing with false statements ( 18 U.”
Patterson v. Off. of Pers. Mgmt., 111 F. App'x 590 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
· cites it 2× “See Veterans Employment Opportunity Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a) (2000). Mr. Patterson further complained of discrimination forbidden by the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERA), 38 U.”
Young v. Fed. Mediation & Conciliation Serv., 66 F. App'x 858 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
“He states that the applicable law is 5 U.S.C. § 3330 [sic: § 3330a] (a)(1), (2)(A-B) and (3) of the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998, and requests “immediate hiring to the applied for position” and other reme *860 dies.”
Demery v. MSPB, No. 24-2215 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2025).
· cites it 3× “Dem- ery failed to file her complaint with the Department of La- bor within the 60-day statutory period under 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(2)(A). Because the Board did not err in finding that Ms.”
Miller v. Fdic, No. 14-3146 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2016).
“5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a). Under 5 U.S.C. § 3311 (2), when experi- ence is a factor in determining eligibility, preference eligible veterans are entitled to “credit” “for all experience material to the position.”
Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2016-2457 (D.D.C. Feb. 13, 2018).
“§ 2108 ; 5 U.S.C. § 3330 ;2 5 U.S.C. § 7203 ; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; criminal statutes dealing with false statements ( 18 U.”
Jolley v. MSPB, No. 18-1538 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 2, 2018).
“Among the requirements was 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(1)(A)’s JOLLEY v. MSPB 5 need for the appellant to establish that he exhausted his Department of Labor administrative remedy before bring- ing an appeal to the Board.”
Richard Lee v. Dep't of Com., No. NY-3330-21-0040-I-1 (MSPB Oct. 9, 2024).
“371 , ¶¶ 8-13 (2009) (applying the holding in Kirkendall and stating that the 60-day time limit for filing a complaint with the Secretary of Labor under 5 U.S.C. § 3330 (a)(2)(A) is not jurisdictional and is subject to equitable tolling).”
Demery v. MSPB, No. 24-2215 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2025).
“MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________ Decided: November 4, 2025 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page 3, change “5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A)” to “U.S.C. § 3330a(a)(2)(A)” On page 3, change “31–35” to…”
5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A): 1 case
Demery v. MSPB, No. 24-2215 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 31, 2025).
“MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent ______________________ Decided: November 4, 2025 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page 3, change “5 U.S.C. § 3330(a)(2)(A)” to “U.S.C. § 3330a(a)(2)(A)” On page 3, change “31–35” to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.