5 U.S.C. § 7116
Unfair labor practices
Section effective 90 days after
Subsec. (a)(5) of this section suspended with respect to any matter proposed for bargaining which would substantially impair the implementation by the United States Forces, and subsec. (a)(7) of this section suspended with regard to any regulation governing the implementation by the United States Forces, of any treaty or agreement, including any minutes or understandings thereto, between the United States and the Government of the host nation, see section 1(b), (c) of Ex. Ord. No. 12391,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 271
cases (25 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). “§7103 (a)(4)(A) (Labor-Management Relations; Definitions) 5 U. S. C. §7116 (b)(4) (Labor-Management Re- lations; Unfair Labor Practices) 5 U.”
Conejo v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps., 377 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “13-2 at 5, filed an allegedly false, substantially false, and/or slanderous unfair labor practice charge against the GPO, claiming, inter alia , that (1) Conejo "has a history of committing 5 U.S.C. § 7116 (a)(5) violations by bypassing the exclusive representative and going…”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 745 F.3d 1219 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “The National Treasury Employees Union petitions for review of the decision of the Federal Labor Relations Authority that the Internal Revenue Service (“the IRS”) did not commit an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116 when it failed to provide the Union notice or an…”
Gutierrez v. Flores, 543 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2008). “1282 (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 7116 (b)(8)). Under § 7118(a)(1), “unfair labor practice complaints” are adjudicated by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (“FLRA”).”
Perry Educ. Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n, 460 U.S. 37 (1983). “Differentiation in access is also permitted in federal employment, and, indeed, it may be an unfair labor practice under 5 U. S. C. § 7116 (a)(3) (1976 ed., Supp.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Chertoff, 385 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005). “"In addition, because these regulations provide that any provision of a collective bargaining agreement that is inconsistent with these regulations or the implementing directives is unenforceable on the effective date of coverage, [DHS] did not identify the action set forth in 5…”
United States Dep't of Navy v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 665 F.3d 1339 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “The first track permits a union alleging an unfair labor practice, as defined in 5 U.S.C. § 7116 , to file a charge with the General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority.”
Thomas O. Barnes v. Harold I. Small, Gen., 840 F.2d 972 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “5 U.S.C. § 7116 (d) (1982). (“Issues which can properly be raised under an appeals procedure may not be raised as unfair labor practices prohibited under this section.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 3090 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 777 F.2d 751 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “§ 7122 (b) which requires government agencies to comply with final arbitration awards, 6 and that this violation constituted an unfair labor practice within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. §§ 7116 (a)(1), (8). 7 On July 29, 1982, the FLRA General Counsel issued an unfair labor practice…”
Columbia Power Trades Council v. United States Dep't of Energy, Bonneville Power Admin. (Bpa), & Sterling Munro, as Bpa Adm'r, 671 F.2d 325 (9th Cir. 1982). “Congress has stated its findings that the statutory regulation of public employee labor relations “safeguards the public interest” and “contributes to the effective conduct of the public business,” and that it is the purpose of the Act to “prescribe certain rights and…”
Am. Fed'n of Govt. v. Donald Trump, 929 F.3d 748 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “We acknowledged that the unions "may not prevail using one of these procedures or would prefer to challenge the Air Force instructions by some other means," such as an APA suit in district court, but "that does not mean their claims may be brought outside the [Statute's]…”
Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Nat'l Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor, 967 F.2d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “Power, who was president of Local Chapter 211 (Local 211) of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) and had frequently represented Local 211 in collective bargaining with PBGC, filed an unfair labor practice charge with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) pursuant…”
— 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(3) — 1 case
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2513, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 174 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.