5 U.S.C. § 7123
Judicial review; enforcement
Section effective 90 days after
Subsec. (b) of this section suspended with respect to any matter which substantially impairs the implementation by the United States Forces of any treaty or agreement, including any minutes or understandings thereto, between the United States and the Government of the host nation, see section 1(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12391,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 362
cases (25 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “The Union appealed from the FLRA’s decision pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a). Rather than ask this court to substitute its original proposal for 5 C.”
Washington Gas Light Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 982 A.2d 691 (D.C. 2009). “In deciding that 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (c) creates a jurisdictional bar, the Supreme Court found it significant that the statute "speaks to courts, not *705 parties.”
Jacqueline A. Tommas Griffith v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 842 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “The district court granted the Authority’s motion for summary judgment, holding that 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a) (1982) barred judicial review of non-constitutional claims, and that Griffith could not make out a colorable due process claim because she had no legitimate claim of…”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps. v. Trump, 318 F. Supp. 3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a) (providing a right of appeal to "[a]ny person aggrieved by any final order of the Authority other than an order under" section 7112 or section 7122 of the FSLMRS); id.”
United States Dep't of Com., Pat. & Trademark Off. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 672 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “'" (quoting 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a)(1))); see also Scott Air Force Base, 35 F.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Etc., Intervenor, 744 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “We have jurisdiction pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7123 . 10 II. Standard of Review The Act provides that the Authority’s rulings are reviewable in accordance with section 10(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.”
Am. Fed'n of Govt. v. Donald Trump, 929 F.3d 748 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “The statutory scheme provides that the courts of appeals "shall have jurisdiction of the [FLRA] proceeding and of the question determined therein" and "may make and enter a decree affirming and enforcing, modifying and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in whole or in…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union, Intervenor, 2 F.3d 1190 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “The NLRB now petitions for review of the FLRA’s negotiability ruling pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a). The FLRA has cross-petitioned for enforcement of its order, see id.”
Dep't of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Serv. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Nat'l Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor, 707 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “See 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (c); 5 C.F.R. § 2424.6 (a)(2).”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 754 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a) (emphasis added). Given that the Authority’s decision on review of the arbitrator’s award plainly involves an unfair labor practice allegedly committed by the IRS, see Overseas Educ.”
Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees, Local 1263 v. Commandant, Def. Language Inst., 493 F. Supp. 675 (N.D. Cal. 1980). “5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a). Second, it provides that the FLRA may petition a circuit court of appeals for enforcement of its orders and for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 745 F.3d 1219 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “1983)); see 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a)(1). Here, the Authority’s reversal of the Arbitrator’s unfair labor practice finding clearly involves an unfair labor practice.”
— 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) — 2 cases
McBryde v. Comm. to Review Circuit Council Conduct & Disability Orders of the Jud. Conf. of the United States, 264 F.3d 52 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 834 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “The Union appealed from the FLRA’s decision pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7123 (a). Rather than ask this court to substitute its original proposal for 5 C.”
— 5 U.S.C. § 7123(c) — 4 cases
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 466 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Nat'l Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor, 840 F.2d 947 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
United States Dep't of Energy v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 880 F.2d 1163 (10th Cir. 1989).
Natl Treas Empl v. FLRA (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.