50 U.S.C. § 1601
SHORT TITLE.
“This title may be cited as the ‘Iran-Iraq Arms Non-Proliferation Act of 1992’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 59
cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984).
Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984). “1255, 50 U. S. C. § 1601 et seq., which, by its § 101(a), provided that powers exercised pursuant to existing states of national emergency would be terminated within two years after its date of enactment.”
United States v. Robert Rollins, 301 F.3d 511 (7th Cir. 2002). “See 50 U.S.C. § 1601 (a) (“All powers and authorities possessed by the President, any other officer or employee of the Federal Government, or any executive agency, .”
United States v. John E. Sandles, 469 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2006). “Sandies argued for dismissal because the bank-robbery statute which he had been charged with violating had been repealed by 50 U.S.C. § 1601 and because the Government did not prove that the bank’s FDIC insurance covered robbery and theft.”
State of California v. Donald Trump, 963 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2020). “The President concurrently issued a proclamation under the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1601–1651, “declar[ing] that a national emergency exists at the southern border of the United States.”
Sierra Club v. Donald Trump, 963 F.3d 874 (9th Cir. 2020). “The President concurrently issued a proclamation under the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1601–1651, “declar[ing] that a national emergency exists at the southern border of the United States.”
In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F. Supp. 2d 539 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “, the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended, 22 U.”
New England Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Iran Power Generation & Transmission Co., 502 F. Supp. 120 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “, the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and 3 U.S.C. § 301 , I, Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, find that the situation in Iran constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United…”
Kashani v. Tsann Kuen China Enter. Co., 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4052 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004). “In imposing the freeze, the President exercised powers authorized under the IEEPA and the National Emergencies Act ( 50 U.S.C. § 1601 ). Thereafter, unilateral trade sanctions were imposed against Iran.”
United States v. Spawr Optical Rsch., Inc., a Corp., Walter J. Spawr & Frances A. Spawr, Individuals, 685 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir. 1982). “This court has previously commented that the national emergencies relied on in this case were terminated effective September 14, 1978 only by operation of the National Emergencies Act of 1976, 50 U.S.C. § 1601 . Cornet Stores v. Morton, 632 F.”
Siemens Energy, Inc. v. PDVSA, 82 F.4th 144 (2d Cir. 2023). “(IEEPA); the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.; and 3 U.S.C. § 301 .”
Mario Alfonso Tagle & Lourdes A. Martinez v. Donald T. Regan, as Sec'y of Treasury of the United States, Defendant, 643 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir. 1981). “S.C. § 1601 (a). Section 502(a)(1) of the law, codified at 50 U.”
Reading & Bates Corp. v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 737 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “, the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and 3 U.S.C. § 301 ,1, Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, find that the situation in Iran constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.