50 U.S.C. § 175
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1944–2000 · leading case: People v. Sullivan, 378 P.2d 633 (Colo. 1963).
People v. Sullivan, 378 P.2d 633 (Colo. 1963). “” On October 9, 1940, the Congress of the United States enacted the following statute, which now appears as 50 U.S.C. §175 (the same statute also appears as 40 U.”
Taylor v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1417 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000). “) Former Political Code section 34, which was in effect when the United States Government accepted jurisdiction over the base, provided, “The Legislature consents to the purchase or condemnation by the United States of any tract of land within this State for the purpose of…”
State v. Dykes, 562 P.2d 1090 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). “§ 255 ; 50 U.S.C. § 175 . In 1941, President Roosevelt by executive order withdrew the land in question from the public domain and established the land as an aerial gunnery and tow target firing range.”
United States v. 1,960 Acres of Land, 54 F. Supp. 867 (S.D. Cal. 1944). “§ 255 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 175 ]; 25 Stat. 941 ) ;• suits for the partition of *882 land in which the Government is a tenant in common or joint tenant (see 30 Stat.”
Adams v. Londeree, 83 S.E.2d 127 (W. Va. 1954). “Unless and until the United States has accepted jurisdiction over lands hereafter to be acquired as aforesaid, it shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been accepted.”
Richardson v. Turner, 401 P.2d 443 (Utah 1965). ““To exercise exclusive legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all…”
Carlton v. Bello, 390 F. Supp. 1321 (W.D. Okla. 1975). “Pursuant to such constitutional authority, Congress has exercised its authority statutorily as set out in 50 U.S.C. § 175 , which provides in part as follows: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the obtaining of exclusive jurisdiction in the United States over lands or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.