50 U.S.C. § 1828

Civil liability

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar

An aggrieved person, other than a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a) or (b)(1)(A), respectively, of this title, whose premises, property, information, or material has been subjected to a physical search within the United States or about whom information obtained by such a physical search has been disclosed or used in violation of section 1827 of this title shall have a cause of action against any person who committed such violation and shall be entitled to recover—(1) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages of $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation, whichever is greater;(2) punitive damages; and(3) reasonable attorney’s fees and other investigative and litigation costs reasonably incurred.(Pub. L. 95–511, title III, § 308, as added Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, § 807(a)(3), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3452.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 14, 1994, with exception for certain physical searches approved by the Attorney General to gather foreign intelligence information, see section 807(c) of Pub. L. 103–359, set out as a note under section 1821 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2014 · leading case: Pichler v. UNITE, 228 F.R.D. 230 (E.D. Pa. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Pichler v. UNITE, 228 F.R.D. 230 (E.D. Pa. 2005). “§ 1810 (2005) (recognizing that an "aggrieved person” is entitled to recover "actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages of $1,000 or $100 per day for each day of violation, whichever is greater”); 50 U.S.C. § 1828 (2005) (same). . Even though it sat in the same state…”

United States v. Huang, 15 F. Supp. 3d 1131 (D.N.M. 2014). “An application to FISC for a FISA order must also include a certification from a high-ranking executive branch official with national security responsibilities, where the official certifies, inter alia, that a “significant purpose” of the surveillance is to obtain foreign and…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.