U.S. Code » Title 54 » Subtitle Subtitle I— National Park System › Division DIVISION A— ESTABLISHMENT AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › Chapter CHAPTER 1005— AREAS OF NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM

54 U.S.C. § 100502

General management plans

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 54 CasesGoogle Scholar
General management plans for the preservation and use of each System unit, including areas within the national capital area, shall be prepared and revised in a timely manner by the Director. On January 1 of each year, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a list indicating the current status of completion or revision of general management plans for each System unit. General management plans for each System unit shall include—(1) measures for the preservation of the area’s resources;(2) indications of types and general intensities of development (including visitor circulation and transportation patterns, systems, and modes) associated with public enjoyment and use of the area, including general locations, timing of implementation, and anticipated costs;(3) identification of and implementation commitments for visitor carrying capacities for all areas of the System unit; and(4) indications of potential modifications to the external boundaries of the System unit, and the reasons for the modifications.(Pub. L. 113–287, § 3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3098.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

100502

16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b).

Pub. L. 91–383, § 12, as added Pub. L. 94–458, § 2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1942; Pub. L. 95–625, title VI, § 604(3), (4), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3518, 3519; Pub. L. 103–437, § 6(c), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4583; Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, § 415(b)(2), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3515.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2023 · leading case: Nat. Resources Def. Council v. Nat'l Park Serv., 250 F. Supp. 3d 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat. Resources Def. Council v. Nat'l Park Serv., 250 F. Supp. 3d 1260 (M.D. Fla. 2017). “54 U.S.C. § 100502 ; AR 178335. By failing to reinitiate consultation, plaintiffs argue, the Agencies imperil their interests in the Florida bonneted bat because the Agencies have not considered how the activities authorized by the Preserve Management Plans may affect the bat.”
Gescheidt v. Haaland (N.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 7× “16 17 54 U.S.C. § 100502 (emphasis added). Such plans shall include (1) “measures for the preservation 18 of the area’s resources”; (2) “indications of types and general intensities of development .”
Gescheidt v. Haaland (N.D. Cal. 2021). “” See 54 U.S.C. § 100502 . Forty years, they posit, is untimely under any definition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.