U.S. Code » Title 54 » Subtitle Subtitle II— Outdoor Recreation Programs › Chapter CHAPTER 2003— LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND

54 U.S.C. § 200301

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 54 CasesGoogle Scholar
In this chapter:(1)Fund.—The term “Fund” means the Land and Water Conservation Fund established under section 200302 of this title.(2)State.—The term “State” means a State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands.(Pub. L. 113–287, § 3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3171.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

200301(1)

no source.

200301(2)

16 U.S.C. 460l–8(b)(5) (last sentence).

Pub. L. 88–578, title I, § 6(b)(5) (last sentence), formerly § 5, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 900; renumbered § 6, Pub. L. 92–347, § 2, July 11, 1972, 86 Stat. 459; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, § 101(3), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1315.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: Boston Redevelopment Auth. v. Nat'l Park Serv., 838 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Boston Redevelopment Auth. v. Nat'l Park Serv., 838 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2016). “See 54 U.S.C. §§ 200301 (2), 2003005(a). Consequently, local redevelopment agencies interested in receiving LWCF grants apply through the state in which they are located.”
Powers v. Long Island Power Auth., No. 21-1755-cv, 2022 WL 3147780 (2d Cir. Aug. 8, 2022). “However, during the course of these proceedings plaintiffs have clearly stated their intent to bring certain federal claims directly— including, in relevant part, claims under the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (“LWCFA”), 54 U.S.C. § 200301 et seq., and the Coastal Zone…”
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026). “Second, they allege that the approval of the ROW violates the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, 54 U.S.C. § 200301 et seq. Id. at 50–52 (Compl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.