54 U.S.C. § 300320
Undertaking
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
300320 | Pub. L. 89–665, title III, § 301(7), as added Pub. L. 96–515, title V, § 501, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3001; Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, § 4019(a)(5), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4764. | |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: Monumental Task Comm., Inc. v. Foxx, 157 F. Supp. 3d 573 (E.D. La. 2016).
Monumental Task Comm., Inc. v. Foxx, 157 F. Supp. 3d 573 (E.D. La. 2016). “54 U.S.C. § 300320 ; 36 C.F.R. § 800.16 (y).”
Havasupai Tribe v. Heather Provencio, 906 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2018). “PROVENCIO 54 U.S.C. § 300320 (3), which omits the reference to continuing projects.”
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. U.S. Corps of Eng'rs, 888 F.3d 906 (8th Cir. 2018). “" 54 U.S.C. § 300320 (3). The Corps has adopted its own regulations implementing the NHPA for purposes of permitting under the CWA.”
Eagle Cnty., Colorado v. STB, 82 F.4th 1152 (D.C. Cir. 2023). “Prior to approving “a project, activity, or program,” 54 U.S.C. § 300320 , federal agencies must also “take into account the effect of the undertaking on any historic property” under the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”), id.”
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Okla v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “" 54 U.S.C. § 300320 . We have construed the statute to mean that, for an action to be a federal undertaking, "only a 'Federal permit, license or approval' is required," not necessarily federal funding.”
Mashack v. Jewell, 149 F. Supp. 3d 11 (D.D.C. 2016). “54 U.S.C. § 300320 . The statute therefore makes clear that “[a]n agency’s failure to act, without moré, is not an ‘undertaking”’ under the ‘NHPA, Nat’l Trust for Historic Pres.”
Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 138 F.4th 1189 (9th Cir. 2025). “” 54 U.S.C. § 300320 (3). It is undisputed that the Project qualifies as an “undertaking” under the NHPA.”
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C. 2016). “” See 54 U.S.C. § 300320 ; 36 C.F.R. § 800.16 (y).”
Friends of Louisville Pub. Art, LLC v. louisville/jefferson Cnty. Metro Historic Landmarks & Pres. Districts Comm'n (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “54 U.S.C. § 300320 ; 36 C.F.R. § 800.16 (y).”
Adams v. FAA (10th Cir. 2026). “at 31–34; see 54 U.S.C. §§ 300320 (3), 306108. “[T]he FAA’s Section 106 and NEPA EA initiatives,” Mr.”
Dc Pres. League v. Bd. of Trs. of the John F. Kennedy Ctr. for the Performing Arts (D.D.C. 2026). “And the construction planned for the Center qualifies as an “undertaking” because it will be “carried out with Federal financial assistance,” in the form of a large Congressional appropriation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.