6 U.S.C. § 553

Terminations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 6 CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, whenever all the functions vested by law in any agency have been transferred pursuant to this chapter, each position and office the incumbent of which was authorized to receive compensation at the rates prescribed for an office or position at level II, III, IV, or V, of the Executive Schedule, shall terminate.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2001 · leading case: Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926 (1986).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lyng v. Payne, 476 U.S. 926 (1986). “” Pursuant to 6 U. S. C. §§553 (b)(B) and (d)(3), the agency dispensed with notice and comment, explaining that any delay in implementing the provisions of Pub.”

Robert B. Reich, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor v. The Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co., 66 F.3d 111 (6th Cir. 1995). “The Secretary of Labor is authorized to promulgate additional regulations pursuant to the Act, in conformity with 6 U.S.C. § 553 (the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act).”

Yale-New Haven Hosp., Inc. v. Thompson, 162 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D. Conn. 2001). “Whether the Rulemaking Violations Asserted in Counts One and Two of the Complaint Are Barred by Collateral Estoppel The primary ground for dismissal raised by the Secretary is that Yale is collaterally estopped from challenging the validity of the manual provision, based upon…”

Nat'l Customs Brokers & Forwarders Ass'n of Am. v. United States, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 754 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “6 U.S.C. § 553 (1988). § 1484 Entry of merchandise.”

Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 14 F.3d 429 (9th Cir. 1993). “Appellants contend that the final 1980-1986 assessment rules failed to comply with the substantive requirements of the APA because they did not include a “general statement of their basis and purpose” as required by 6 U.S.C. § 553 (e). However, regulations with no statement of…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.