7 U.S.C. § 1000
Short title
Sections 1001 to 1006, 1006c to 1006e, 1007, 1008 to 1010, 1011, 1012, and 1013 to 1029 of this title may be cited as “The Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1939–1987 · leading case: Clevenger v. Rio Farms, Inc., 204 S.W.2d 40 (Tex. App. 1947).
Clevenger v. Rio Farms, Inc., 204 S.W.2d 40 (Tex. App. 1947). “ownership has been approved throughout American history as a primary means of attaining security”; a portion of the President’s message of February 16, 1937, transmitting the report of this Special Committee to Congress, in which the policy of the government to assist worthy…”
United States v. Wiley's Cove Ranch, 181 F. Supp. 371 (W.D. Ark. 1960). “Both applications were approved by the local County Committee appointed pursuant to the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1000 et seq. Following the original approval, the County Committee was requested to reexamine the question of the defendant partnership’s…”
Sam D. Rawson v. United States, 225 F.2d 855 (9th Cir. 1955). “725 , 7 U.S.C.A. § 1000 et seq. In 1940 the Department of Agriculture and the Oregon State Highway Commission entered into a fifty-year licensing agreement wherein the Commission was authorized to remove stone, gravel and other materials from the area for use in construction…”
Duvall-Wheeler Livestock Barn v. United States, 415 F.2d 226 (5th Cir. 1969). “Under the provisions of the Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1000 et seq., The Farmers Home Administration made four loans to Gerald L.”
Sullivan v. Farmers Home Admin., 691 F. Supp. 927 (E.D.N.C. 1987). “County Committees were originally a provision of The BankheadJones Farm Tenant Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1000 , et seq., which was largely replaced by the Agricultural Enabling Amendments Act of 1961, Pub.”
United States v. Forrester, 118 F. Supp. 401 (W.D. Ark. 1954). “522 , 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 1000 -1005d, 1007, and 1008-1029.”
In Re United States, 28 F. Supp. 758 (W.D.N.Y. 1939). “By the Act of July 22, 1937, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1000 et seq., Congress set up a program for retirement of sub-marginal lands, lands not suited primarily for cultivation, to “assist in controlling soil erosion, reforestation, preserving natural resources, mitigating floods * * *,” etc.”
United States v. James R. Darrow & Edith Darrow, James M. Burrell & C. Marie Burrell, James Martin & Virginia Martin, 367 F.2d 354 (10th Cir. 1966). “The United States appeals from an adverse and summary judgment of dismissal entered by the District Court for the District of Kansas in an action wherein the United States sought to foreclose two mortgages which were given to the Farmers Home Administration of the Department of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.