7 U.S.C. § 1101

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1978–2008 · leading case: Burlison v. United States, 533 F.3d 419 (6th Cir. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Burlison v. United States, 533 F.3d 419 (6th Cir. 2008). “3d at 589 (citing 7 U.S.C. § 1101 ; 16 U.S.C. § 551 ). The Eighth Circuit held that the “‘special use’ regulations” providing that “[b]efore conducting a special use, individuals or entities must submit a proposal to the authorized officer and must obtain a special use…”

Binns v. Panama Canal Co., 459 F. Supp. 956 (D.C.Z. 1978). “§ 4 amended 7 U.S.C. § 1101 (o) of the Sugar Act of 1948; § 9(b) amended 12 U.”

Burlison v. United States (6th Cir. 2008). “3d at 589 (citing 7 U.S.C. § 1101 ; 16 U.S.C. § 551 ). The Eighth Circuit held that the “‘special use’ regulations” providing that “[b]efore conducting a special use, individuals or entities must submit a proposal to the authorized officer and must obtain a special use…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.