7 U.S.C. § 1368
Effect of increase on other quotas
Notwithstanding any increase of any farm marketing quota for any farm as a result of review of the determination thereof under this subpart, the marketing quotas for other farms shall not be affected.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1956–2015 · leading case: Severn Peanut Co., Inc. v. Indus. Fumigant Co., 807 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 2015).
Severn Peanut Co., Inc. v. Indus. Fumigant Co., 807 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 2015). “7 U.S.C. § 1368 (a)(2)(G); N.C. GemStat. § 143-443(b)(3).”
J. T. Fulford v. Jesse v. B. Forman, Elmer G. Gardner & Murphey W. Luna, 245 F.2d 145 (5th Cir. 1957). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1368 : “Notwithstanding any increase of any farm marketing quota for any farm as the result of review of the determination thereof under sections 1361-1368 of this title, the marketing quotas for other farms shall not be affected.”
Berger v. Hanlon, 129 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. 1997). “Berger applied Furadan to sheep carcasses with the intent of killing predators, including eagles, in violation of 7 U.S.C. §§ 1368 (a)(2)(G). Before trial, the magistrate judge denied a defense motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that the agents lacked probable cause to…”
Gladney v. Review Comm., 230 F. Supp. 35 (W.D. La. 1964). “…Committee not inconsistent with this opinion. The “marketing quotas” for other farms shall not be affected hereby. 7 U.S.C. § 1368 .”
Gladney v. Review Comm., 257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. La. 1966). “7 U.S.C. § 1368 .” Petitioner also contends that the Court of Appeals lacks the power under 7 U.”
Fulford v. Forman, 144 F. Supp. 536 (S.D. Tex. 1956). “7 U.S.C.A. § 1368 . . 7 U.S.C.A. § 1363 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.