Notes of Decisions
California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United States, 7 Cl. Ct. 69 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 2× “, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136m, in which indemnification was statutorily provided; see also TRIS Indemnification Act, Pub.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 548 F.2d 998 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
“Such a delay is specifically authorized by the FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. § 136m(b)(2), which provides that “the Administrator may provide a reasonable time for use or other disposal” of a suspended pesticide.”
Chevron Chem. Corp. v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 807 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 2× “On June 15, 1981 plaintiff and defendant entered into a stipulation settlement for the cost of the Silvex pursuant to section 15 of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. § 136m. In this action plaintiff seeks to recover the costs incurred in storing the pesticides from February 1980 (the date on…”
Nat'l Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides v. Env't Prot. Agency, 867 F.2d 636 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
“See 7 U.S.C. § 136m (1982). 8 . Under appellees narrow construction of the statute, the Administrator could refuse to seek suspension or emergency suspension upon noticing a cancellation only if he demonstrated either that short-term exposure to the pesticide does not present…”
Gro-Green Prods., Inc. v. United States, 3 Cl. Ct. 639 (Ct. Cl. 1983).
· cites it 2× “The plaintiffs contend that they are justly entitled to recover indemnification from the *640 United States for their losses, under section 15 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended (7 U.S.C. § 136m (1982)). In addition, plaintiff…”
Black Leaf Prods. Co. v. United States, 4 Cl. Ct. 307 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
· cites it 3× “§§ 136 -136y (1982) (the “FIFRA”), sues to enforce an agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), inter alia, settling plaintiff’s claim to be indemnified under 7 U.S.C. § 136m for the cancellation of a pesticide registration held by plaintiff.”
Cedar Chem. Corp. v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 25 (Ct. Cl. 1989).
“7 U.S.C. § 136m(a)(3). In 1986, the EPA took action leading toward cancellation of Cedar Chemical Corporation’s (Cedar or plaintiff) pesticide Dinoseb.”
Lebanon Chem. Corp. v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 812 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“7 U.S.C. § 136m. The agency is to establish procedures for the storage, transportation, and disposal of cancelled pesticides;, however, as contrasted with the indemnity provisions, there are no statutory provisions for government reimbursement to registrants or owners of…”
A.M. Lewis, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 784 (Ct. Cl. 1981).
“15 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. § 136m, arising from the suspension and cancellation of "Silver” registrations.”
J. & L. Adikes, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 604 (Ct. Cl. 1981).
“- — On November 17,1981 the court entered the following order: The petition in the above-entitled cause was filed December 3, 1980 to seek, inter alia, indemnification pursuant to Section 15 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Roden-ticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136m. On…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 136m(a)(3) — 1 case
Cedar Chem. Corp. v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 25 (Ct. Cl. 1989).
“7 U.S.C. § 136m(a)(3). In 1986, the EPA took action leading toward cancellation of Cedar Chemical Corporation’s (Cedar or plaintiff) pesticide Dinoseb.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 136m(b)(2) — 1 case
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 548 F.2d 998 (D.C. Cir. 1976).
“Such a delay is specifically authorized by the FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. § 136m(b)(2), which provides that “the Administrator may provide a reasonable time for use or other disposal” of a suspended pesticide.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 136m(b)(l) — 1 case
Black Leaf Prods. Co. v. United States, 4 Cl. Ct. 307 (Ct. Cl. 1984).
“§§ 136 -136y (1982) (the “FIFRA”), sues to enforce an agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), inter alia, settling plaintiff’s claim to be indemnified under 7 U.S.C. § 136m for the cancellation of a pesticide registration held by plaintiff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.