7 U.S.C. § 136t
Delegation and cooperation
All authority vested in the Administrator by virtue of the provisions of this subchapter may with like force and effect be executed by such employees of the Environmental Protection Agency as the Administrator may designate for the purpose.
The Administrator shall cooperate with Department of Agriculture, any other Federal agency, and any appropriate agency of any State or any political subdivision thereof, in carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, and in securing uniformity of regulations.
For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care, Inc., 207 A.3d 695 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019).
Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care, Inc., 207 A.3d 695 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019). “In addition to these provisions, § 136v(a) of FIFRA ("Authority of States") expressly allows a state to "regulate the sale or use of any federally registered pesticide[.”
Am. Vanguard Corp. v. Jackson, 803 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 2011). “To support this contention, AMVAC submits an internal EPA memorandum in which the Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance delegates authority under the FIFRA — including the power to issue SSUROs — to the Director of the Toxics and Pesticides Enforcement…”
Prof'l Lawn Care Ass'n v. Vill. of Milford, 909 F.2d 929 (6th Cir. 1990). “” 7 U.S.C. § 136t(b). These statutory directives for the Administrator to cooperate with appropriate local officials and political subdivisions shed little or no light on the question whether pesticides may be regulated by local ordinance.”
Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019). “” 7 U.S.C. § 136t(b). 11 Under § 136v: (a) A State may regulate the sale or use of any federally registered pesticide or device in the State, but only if and to the extent the regulation does not permit any sale or use prohibited by this subchapter.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 136t(a) — 1 case
Am. Vanguard Corp. v. Jackson, 803 F. Supp. 2d 8 (D.D.C. 2011). “To support this contention, AMVAC submits an internal EPA memorandum in which the Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance delegates authority under the FIFRA — including the power to issue SSUROs — to the Director of the Toxics and Pesticides Enforcement…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 136t(b) — 3 cases
Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care, Inc., 207 A.3d 695 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019). “In addition to these provisions, § 136v(a) of FIFRA ("Authority of States") expressly allows a state to "regulate the sale or use of any federally registered pesticide[.”
Prof'l Lawn Care Ass'n v. Vill. of Milford, 909 F.2d 929 (6th Cir. 1990). “” 7 U.S.C. § 136t(b). These statutory directives for the Administrator to cooperate with appropriate local officials and political subdivisions shed little or no light on the question whether pesticides may be regulated by local ordinance.”
Montgomery Cnty. v. Complete Lawn Care (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019). “” 7 U.S.C. § 136t(b). 11 Under § 136v: (a) A State may regulate the sale or use of any federally registered pesticide or device in the State, but only if and to the extent the regulation does not permit any sale or use prohibited by this subchapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.