7 U.S.C. § 1444e

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–1992 · leading case: In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989).
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). · cites it 6× “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
In Re Pritchard, 75 B.R. 877 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “The asset described is apparently a payment due under one of the Department of Agriculture deficiency and set-aside programs created under 7 U.S.C. § 1444e. 2 . The statute provides in pertinent part as follows: A payment which may be made to a farmer under this section, may be…”
Brown v. Farmers Home Admin. (In Re Koerkenmeier), 107 B.R. 195 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1989). “7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(f)(5)(A), 1445b-3(f)(5)(A)(i), 1444e(c)(1)(C), 1444e(c)(1)(F), and 1445b-3(c)(1)(D).”
Mktg. Loans for Grains & Wheat (OLC 1992). “1354, 1396 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(a)(4)(A) (1988)).3 2Section 107B(a)(4)(A) is identical except that it refers in (iii) to the prevailing world market price for wheat.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(a) — 1 case
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(a)(4)(A) — 1 case
Mktg. Loans for Grains & Wheat (OLC 1992). “1354, 1396 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(a)(4)(A) (1988)).3 2Section 107B(a)(4)(A) is identical except that it refers in (iii) to the prevailing world market price for wheat.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(c)(l)(D)(i) — 1 case
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(f)(5)(A) — 2 cases
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
Brown v. Farmers Home Admin. (In Re Koerkenmeier), 107 B.R. 195 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1989). “7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(f)(5)(A), 1445b-3(f)(5)(A)(i), 1444e(c)(1)(C), 1444e(c)(1)(F), and 1445b-3(c)(1)(D).”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(f)(5)(B) — 1 case
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(j) — 1 case
In Re Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley, Debtors. Truman R. Kingsley & Connie Kingsley v. First Am. Bank of Casselton, 865 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 1444e(a), (b); 1445b-3(a), (b).”
— 7 U.S.C. § 1444e(k) — 1 case
In Re Pritchard, 75 B.R. 877 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1987). “The asset described is apparently a payment due under one of the Department of Agriculture deficiency and set-aside programs created under 7 U.S.C. § 1444e. 2 . The statute provides in pertinent part as follows: A payment which may be made to a farmer under this section, may be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.