7 U.S.C. § 1903

Repealed. Pub. L. 95–445, § 5(b), Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1069

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–2009 · leading case: Levine v. Vilsack, 587 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2009).
Levine v. Vilsack, 587 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 3× “862, 862-63 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 1903 (repealed 1978)). 3 The following year, USDA pre *989 scribed humane slaughter methods for those species expressly identified in the statute in addition to goats.”
Jones v. Butz, 374 F. Supp. 1284 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). “”7 U.S.C. § 1903. The plaintiffs’ challenge to the Act is directed to sections 2(b), 5, and 6 ( 7 U.”
Ellen Levine v. Edward T. Schafer (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 3× “862, 862-63 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 1903 (repealed 1978)).3 The following year, USDA prescribed humane slaughter methods for those species expressly identi- fied in the statute in addition to goats.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.