7 U.S.C. § 499k
Injunctions; application of injunction laws governing orders of Interstate Commerce Commission
For the purposes of this chapter the provisions of all laws relating to the suspending or restraining of the enforcement, operation, or execution, or the setting-aside, in whole or in part, of the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission are made applicable to orders of the Secretary under this chapter and to any person subject to the provisions of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1935–1940 · leading case: Spano v. W. Fruit Growers, Inc., 83 F.2d 150 (10th Cir. 1936).
Spano v. W. Fruit Growers, Inc., 83 F.2d 150 (10th Cir. 1936). “Section 11 (7 U.S.C.A. § 499k). The act approved April 13, 1934 brought several new provisions into the statute.”
Jamestown Veneer & Plywood Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 13 F. Supp. 405 (W.D.N.Y. 1936). “Section 11 of that act (7 U.S.C.A. § 499k) made certain provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act applicable in so far as they related to the suspension and enforcement of the order of the commissioner.”
Abe Rafelson Co. v. Tugwell, 79 F.2d 653 (7th Cir. 1935). “New York and his official residence is in the District of Columbia and he was never served with process in the Northern District of Illinois, appellant relies upon the following statutes: Section 11 of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 1930, 7 USCA § 499k: “For the…”
Ackert v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 115 F.2d 455 (4th Cir. 1940). “§ 217 and 7 U.S.C.A. § 499k, relating to proceedings to set aside orders of the Secretary of Agriculture; 48 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.