7 U.S.C. § 5341

Establishment of dietary guidelines

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Report(1) In general

At least every five years the Secretaries shall publish a report entitled “Dietary Guidelines for Americans”. Each such report shall contain nutritional and dietary information and guidelines for the general public, and shall be promoted by each Federal agency in carrying out any Federal food, nutrition, or health program.

(2) Basis of guidelines

The information and guidelines contained in each report required under paragraph (1) shall be based on the preponderance of the scientific and medical knowledge which is current at the time the report is prepared.

(3) Pregnant women and young children

Not later than the 2020 report and in each report thereafter, the Secretaries shall include national nutritional and dietary information and guidelines for pregnant women and children from birth until the age of 2.

(b) Approval by Secretaries(1) Review

Any Federal agency that proposes to issue any dietary guidance for the general population or identified population subgroups shall submit the text of such guidance to the Secretaries for a sixty-day review period.

(2) Basis of review(A) In generalDuring the sixty-day review period established in paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall review and approve or disapprove such guidance to assure that the guidance either is consistent with the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans” or that the guidance is based on medical or new scientific knowledge which is determined to be valid by the Secretaries. If after such sixty-day period neither Secretary notifies the proposing agency that such guidance has been disapproved, then such guidance may be issued by the agency. If both Secretaries disapprove of such guidance, it shall be returned to the agency. If either Secretary finds that such guidance is inconsistent with the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans” and so notifies the proposing agency, such agency shall follow the procedures set forth in this subsection before disseminating such proposal to the public in final form. If after such sixty-day period, either Secretary disapproves such guidance as inconsistent with the “Dietary Guidelines for Americans” the proposing agency shall—(i) publish a notice in the Federal Register of the availability of the full text of the proposal and the preamble of such proposal which shall explain the basis and purpose for the proposed dietary guidance;(ii) provide in such notice for a public comment period of thirty days; and(iii) make available for public inspection and copying during normal business hours any comment received by the agency during such comment period.(B) Review of comments

After review of comments received during the comment period either Secretary may approve for dissemination by the proposing agency a final version of such dietary guidance along with an explanation of the basis and purpose for the final guidance which addresses significant and substantive comments as determined by the proposing agency.

Any such final dietary guidance to be disseminated under subparagraph (B) shall be announced in a notice published in the Federal Register, before public dissemination along with an address where copies may be obtained.

(D) Notification of disapproval

If after the thirty-day period for comment as provided under subparagraph (A)(ii), both Secretaries disapprove a proposed dietary guidance, the Secretaries shall notify the Federal agency submitting such guidance of such disapproval, and such guidance may not be issued, except as provided in subparagraph (E).

(E) Review of disapproval

If a proposed dietary guidance is disapproved by both Secretaries under subparagraph (D), the Federal agency proposing such guidance may, within fifteen days after receiving notification of such disapproval under subparagraph (D), request the Secretaries to review such disapproval. Within fifteen days after receiving a request for such a review, the Secretaries shall conduct such review. If, pursuant to such review, either Secretary approves such proposed dietary guidance, such guidance may be issued by the Federal agency.

(3) Limitation on definition of guidance

For purposes of this subsection, the term “dietary guidance for the general population” does not include any rule or regulation issued by a Federal agency.

(4) “Identified population subgroups” defined

For purposes of this subsection, the term “identified population subgroups” shall include, but not be limited to, groups based on factors such as age, sex, or race.

(c) Existing authority not affectedThis section does not place any limitations on—(1) the conduct or support of any scientific or medical research by any Federal agency;(2) the presentation of any scientific or medical findings or the exchange or review of scientific or medical information by any Federal agency; or(3) the authority of the Food and Drug Administration under the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 11 So in original. Probably should be “301”. et seq.).(Pub. L. 101–445, title III, § 301, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1042; Pub. L. 113–79, title IV, § 4204, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 822.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(3), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§ 301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.

Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 113–79 added par. (3).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. Glickman, 117 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. Glickman, 117 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000). “7 U.S.C. § 5341 (a)(1). The Guidelines set forth recommended nutritional and dietary information, and are relied upon by federal agencies in carrying out their responsibilities under federal food, nutrition, and health programs.”

Am. Beverage Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 187 F. Supp. 3d 1123 (N.D. Cal. 2016). “7 U.S.C. § 5341 (a)(2) (providing that the information and guidelines in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans “shall be based on the preponderance of the scientific and medical knowledge which is current at the time the report is prepared”).”

Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. Vilsack, 867 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 3× “On March 11, 2010, plaintiff submitted to defendants a petition requesting they exercise their joint authority under the National Nutrition Monitoring & Related Research Act (“Nutrition Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 5341 , to withdraw the current MyPyramid food diagram and associated…”

Physicians Comm. for Responsible Med. v. Vilsack (N.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 7 U.S.C. § 5341 (a)(1)-(2). These Guidelines are then used as the 6 basis of the government’s “food assistance and meal programs, nutrition education efforts, and 7 decisions about national2 health objectives.”

Post Foods, LLC v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 2018). “) 19 diets that Petitioners rely on: “Defendants reference, among others, the following federal policies promoting consumption of whole grains: 7 U.S.C. §5341 (authorizing the establishment of ‘Dietary Guidelines for Americans,’ one such guideline encourages Americans to eat at…”

Post Foods, LLC v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 641 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2018). “Trial Court's Obstacle Preemption Ruling The trial court judicially noticed and summarized the federal statutory directives promoting whole grains in Americans' diets that Petitioners rely on: "Defendants reference, among others, the following federal policies promoting…”

Ctr. for Sci. in the Pub. Interest v. Perdue (D. Maryland 2020). “” 7 U.S.C. § 5341 (a)(1). The School Meals Report, published in 2010 by the Institute of Medicine’s Committee on Nutrition Standards for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (the “Committee”), was commissioned by USDA to provide recommendations for the revision of “the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.