7 U.S.C. § 904
LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY TO EQUINE FOR SLAUGHTER.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases, 1949–2019 · leading case: Alabama Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Alabama Power Co., 176 So. 2d 483 (Ala. 1965).
Alabama Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Alabama Power Co., 176 So. 2d 483 (Ala. 1965). “Appellees' contentions are based upon the provision in the federal law (7 U.S. C.A. § 904) that the administration is authorized and empowered to make loans for rural electrification to persons and cooperative associations "for the purpose of financing the construction and…”
Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 (1973). “1365 , as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 904 , from borrowing federal funds to provide power to towns already receiving central station service.”
Tallahatchie Valley Elec. Power Ass'n v. MISS. PROPANE GAS Ass'n, INC., 812 So. 2d 912 (Miss. 2002). “Furthermore, the language of 7 U.S.C. § 904 , which authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to provide loans under the REAct provides, in part: The Secretary is authorized and empowered.”
Alabama Power Co. v. Alabama Elec. Coop., Inc., 394 F.2d 672 (5th Cir. 1968). “§ 1009 , is precluded by that statute’s initial exception to the right of review: “Except as (i) statutes preclude judicial review or (2) agency action is by law committed to agency discretion * * ” The REA Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 904 , commits to the discretion of the Administrator…”
Util. L. Rep. P 13,930 Wabash Valley Power Ass'n, Inc., an Indiana Not-For-Profit Corp. v. Rural Electrification Admin., 988 F.2d 1480 (7th Cir. 1993). “” 7 U.S.C. § 904 . If the Administrator finds that the loan “will be repaid,” then the loan is authorized by statute, at the statutorily-fixed interest rate.”
Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 115 F. Supp. 402 (D.D.C. 1953). “7 U.S.C.A. § 904 . 2. Whether the loan contracts violate the rural area provision of the RE Act.”
Rural Electrification Admin. v. Cent. Louisiana Elec. Co., Inc., 354 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1966). “the proposed loan violated the purposes of the REA Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 904 , violated the directives of the Congressional Committees, violated Bulletin 111-3, and violated complainant’s constitutional rights; (4) .”
Greensboro Lumber Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 643 F. Supp. 1345 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “” 7 U.S.C. § 904 . The REA Act further requires that such loans “be self-liquidating within a period of not to exceed thirty-five years,” id.”
William Willis, III v. Dixie Elec. Power Assn, 926 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 2019). “" See 7 U.S.C. § 904 (a). 11 Ark. Elec. Coop. Corp.”
Cajun Elec. Power Coop., Inc. v. Cent. Louisiana Elec. Co., 69 F.3d 746 (5th Cir. 1995). “7 U.S.C. § 904 . . For example, Congress provided specific rules in cases involving "a single asset real estate business," see 11 U.”
City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Elec., 837 F. Supp. 194 (W.D. La. 1993). “…by the City of Morgan City. The REA Act provides at 7 U.S.C. § 907 : “No borrower of funds under § 4 of § 201 ( 7 U.S.C. § 904 or § 922) shall, without the approval of the Administrator, sell or dispose of its property, rights, or franchises, acquired under the…”
Rural Electrification Admin. v. N. States Power Co., 373 F.2d 686 (8th Cir. 1967). “The loan by the REA is pursuant to § 4 of 7 U.S.C. § 904 , and constitutes a 5.9 Million Dollar long-term loan for the construction of transmission facilities in Minnesota and South Dakota.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.