Notes of Decisions
Cited in
278
cases (
68 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case:
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 24× “These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
· cites it 26× “8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
· cites it 17× “In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
· cites it 16× “In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 7× “at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 16× “KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
· cites it 14× “Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
Leymis Velasquez v. William P. Barr, 979 F.3d 572 (8th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 15× “Background These cases concern two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): the designation of TPS under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a, and the adjustment of status to LPR under 8 U.”
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
· cites it 9× “8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
· cites it 14× “8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(1) — 2 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(5)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a) — 8 cases
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1) — 24 cases
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
“These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1)(A) — 23 cases
H-g-g, 27 I. & N. Dec. 617 (BIA 2019).
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1)(B) — 2 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) — 1 case
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(3)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(4) — 4 cases
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(4)(A) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(4)(B) — 4 cases
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(5) — 6 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
H-g-g, 27 I. & N. Dec. 617 (BIA 2019).
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(l) — 15 cases
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(l)(A) — 11 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(l)(B) — 3 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b) — 25 cases
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
“These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
“at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(1) — 20 cases
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
“These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(1)(A) — 6 cases
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
Leymis Velasquez v. William P. Barr, 979 F.3d 572 (8th Cir. 2020).
“Background These cases concern two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): the designation of TPS under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a, and the adjustment of status to LPR under 8 U.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(1)(B) — 2 cases
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(1)(B)(i) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(1)(C) — 17 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(2) — 8 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
“KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(2)(A) — 1 case
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(2)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3) — 6 cases
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3)(A) — 7 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3)(B) — 6 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(3)(C) — 5 cases
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(A) — 21 cases
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
“These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(5)(B) — 12 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
Crista Ramos v. Chad Wolf, 975 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2020).
“These efforts eventually culminated in the 1990 enactment of the TPS statute, now codified in section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. RAMOS V. WOLF 13 The TPS statute authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security 1 to designate foreign countries…”
A-s-j, 25 I. & N. Dec. 893 (BIA 2012).
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(l) — 9 cases
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(l)(A) — 5 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(l)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(l)(B)(i) — 4 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c) — 11 cases
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
“KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1) — 1 case
H-g-g, 27 I. & N. Dec. 617 (BIA 2019).
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1)(A) — 8 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1)(A)(i) — 7 cases
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
“at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
Centro Presente v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 332 F. Supp. 3d 393 (D.D.C. 2018).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(1). 1 While an individual has TPS, the Secretary may not remove the individual from the United States and must authorize the individual to engage in employment in the United States.”
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
“KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1)(A)(ii) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1)(A)(iii) — 2 cases
Ramos v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
“Although the judicial review provision in that proposed legislation is similar to the language ultimately included in the general TPS statute passed and codified at 8 U.S.C § 1254a, the latter was part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(1)(A)(iv) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2) — 8 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(A) — 4 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(A)(ii) — 2 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(A)(iii) — 4 cases
Moncada, 24 I. & N. Dec. 62 (BIA 2007).
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(B) — 12 cases
Saget v. Trump, 375 F. Supp. 3d 280 (E.D.N.Y 2019).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2) ; id="p298" href="#p298" data-label="298" data-citation-index="1" class="page-label" *298 id.”
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(B)(i) — 27 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(2)(B)(ii) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(3)(A) — 3 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(3)(C) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(4) — 2 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(4)(A) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(4)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(5) — 3 cases
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
“at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(A) — 9 cases
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
“KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(A)(i) — 5 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(A)(ii) — 2 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(A)(iii) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(A)(iv) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(B) — 2 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(c)(l)(b) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(d)(3) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(d)(4) — 17 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(e) — 6 cases
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
“at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(e)(2)(B) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(e)(l)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Cervantes v. Holder, 597 F.3d 229 (4th Cir. 2010).
“KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Jorge Ramos Cervantes, Paola Ramos Cervantes, and Daniel Ramos Cervantes, who are siblings, seek appellate review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "BIA"), which rejected their attempt to forestall removal from the United…”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(e)(l)(A)(iii) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f) — 10 cases
Jose Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, 47 F.4th 908 (9th Cir. 2022).
“at 1812 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b). The Government may designate a country for protection if the country suffers from dangerous conditions arising from armed conflicts or natural disasters.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(1) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(3) — 9 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(4) — 32 cases
Leymis Velasquez v. William P. Barr, 979 F.3d 572 (8th Cir. 2020).
“Background These cases concern two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): the designation of TPS under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a, and the adjustment of status to LPR under 8 U.”
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(l) — 4 cases
United States v. Orellana, 405 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In response to this disaster, the United States Attorney General exercised his authority under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a (“section 1254a”) and designated El Salvador for protected status.”
United States v. Flores, 404 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2005).
“In March 2001, the Attorney General designated El Salvador as a country whose citizens may be eligible for “temporary protected status” (“TPS”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. 1 In May 2001, Flores surfaced and applied for TPS.”
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(g) — 2 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(h) — 2 cases
Medina v. Beers, 65 F. Supp. 3d 419 (E.D. Pa. 2014).
“8 U.S.C. § 1254a. While Congress has not, to date, enacted any special legislation or expressed any intention to make all such Honduran TPS beneficiaries eligible for lawful permanent resident adjustment under § 1255, that inaction is irrelevant to the question at issue here.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(h)(2) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.